I am so very impressed with your adroit
handing of the critical situation; and relieved at the minimal consequences to
you and your airplane. I’ll have to admit that I am also concerned
and disturbed that we are having these engine-out forced landings that so
easily could end up with more unpleasant outcomes. We must find ways to
reduce the number of these occurrences. What is it we need? More
thorough inspections, maybe involving other builders? More thorough
testing? What?
And if you can explain how you managed
to get that slippery airplane down and stopped in 600 ft, I’d sure like
to know. Amazing! It’s info I never hope to need, but . .
.
Al
-----Original Message-----
From: Rotary motors in aircraft
[mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On
Behalf Of Paul
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005
6:09 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Bad day at
the airport
On Sunday I decided to do a little
"tweaking" on the ECU fuel mixtures on my 13b powered SQ2000. I
had the larger 3 bladed Performance prop on, and just wasn't getting the rpm's
I wanted, so I put the smaller dia/less pitch prop on and took it to the end of
the runway and once I was lined up on the runway, advanced the throttle to wide
open. RPM's were only around 5100, but I have flown it that way before, so I
decided to go ahead and try to work with the mixture programming at 5000
feet. Acceleration was normal, liftoff in less than 2000 feet, and
started my climb. At approximately 250 feet, the engine started failing
rapidly. I tried various throttle positions, with no improvement. Unable to
maintain altitude. I immediately started a left turn, hoping maybe the engine
would recover enough to just get me to 500 feet downwind so I would have a
chance of making the runway. No such luck. I was now heading back toward
the center of the airport at approximately 100 feet and descending. I
wanted to land on the center turn-off section in the middle of the airport, but
that would have me landing straight towards several parked aircraft and the
main hangar. Not the best option. There is a newly paved area
slightly to my left, where aircraft may be tied down in the future, but it was
empty for now. I was out of options and altitude. I crossed the runway at less
than 50 feet. I didn't want to land going across the runway, because the grass
and mud I would encounter after rolling across the runway would probably flip
the aircraft over. I headed for the new aircraft tie-down area, and
attacked it at a 45 degree angle to get as much "runway" as
possible. I held it off until I was over the parallel taxiway, and landed
on the parallel taxiway (the short way, of course) and with heavy braking,
began skidding across the aircraft tie-down area. (See attached photos).
I knew I couldn't stop in that short a distance, but hopefully when I went off
the other end of the pavement, I would not be going as fast. The nose was
dipped down at an angle from all the heavy braking, so I had a nice view of
what was coming. Grass, mud and a ditch. The aircraft kept slowing down,
and as I ran out of pavement, I wasn't going all that fast. I probably only
went 10 feet past the end of the paved area into the grass and came to a
stop. Missed the ditch by almost 5 feet !!! No problem...that was
fun !!! Just don't care to do it again. I restarted the engine and
taxiied back to the hangar, pretending nothing had happened. I don't know what
to do at this point. I don't care to have this much fun again anytime
soon. I'm torn between a carburetor and a Cessna. Paul Conner