Return-Path: Received: from imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.72] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.8) with ESMTP id 617078 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 21:08:12 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.72; envelope-from=ceengland@bellsouth.net Received: from [209.215.60.25] by imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id <20050122020741.OKRE2032.imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net@[209.215.60.25]> for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 21:07:41 -0500 Message-ID: <41F1B54B.9080706@bellsouth.net> Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 20:07:07 -0600 From: Charlie England User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: P Port fuel Injection References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Tracy Crook wrote: > > > I'd bet that the better BSFC with remoted injectors that's hyped on the > other list was only achieved (wasn't the info from the Mazda factory > racing program?) with perfect injector placement & timing based on more > testing than any of us can do in our proverbial garages. (Is injector > timing variable on Tracy's or any other injection controller out there?) > > >From one neophite to another.... > > Charlie > I think that better BSFC report was from the Racing Beat 3 rotor 900 > HP turbo engine project. I think this is so far removed from what we > are doing that it's not applicable, even if true. > > BTW, The EC2 does use port timed injection. > > Tracy Understood, but does it matter that the timing of each injection relative to the port open/close cycle changes when the injector is moved from the block to over a foot away, & can it be adjusted like ignition timing? Charlie