Return-Path: Received: from imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.67] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.8) with ESMTP id 617020 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 19:46:00 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.67; envelope-from=atlasyts@bellsouth.net Received: from [65.11.55.170] by imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id <20050122004530.MFUY2048.imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net@[65.11.55.170]> for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 19:45:30 -0500 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0 Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 19:45:47 -0500 Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: P Port fuel Injection From: Bulent Aliev To: Rotary motors in aircraft Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3189181551_17914237" > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --B_3189181551_17914237 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit That makes me feel much better Ernest. I used Paul's runners but not his advise. Left the primaries in their original place on the block, and the secondary injectors on the runners approximately the same distance as the original setup. Starts right away, but have no full power data yet. Buly On 1/21/05 2:36 PM, "Tracy Crook" wrote: > > > I'd bet that the better BSFC with remoted injectors that's hyped on the > other list was only achieved (wasn't the info from the Mazda factory > racing program?) with perfect injector placement & timing based on more > testing than any of us can do in our proverbial garages. (Is injector > timing variable on Tracy's or any other injection controller out there?) > >> >From one neophite to another.... > > Charlie > I think that better BSFC report was from the Racing Beat 3 rotor 900 HP turbo > engine project. I think this is so far removed from what we are doing that > it's not applicable, even if true. > > BTW, The EC2 does use port timed injection. > > Tracy > --B_3189181551_17914237 Content-type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Re: [FlyRotary] Re: P Port fuel Injection That makes me feel m= uch better Ernest. I used Paul's runners but not his
advise. Left the primaries in their original place on the block, and the secondary injectors on the runners approximately the same distance as the original setup. Starts right away, but have no full power data yet.
Buly

On 1/21/05 2:36 PM, "Tracy Crook" <lors01@msn.com> wrote:

 
I'd bet that the better BSFC with remoted injectors that's hyped on the other list was only achieved (wasn't the info from the Mazda factory
racing program?) with perfect injector placement & timing based on more=
testing than any of us can do in our proverbial garages. (Is injector
timing variable on Tracy's or any other injection controller out there?)
 >From one neophite to another....

Charlie
I think that better BSFC report was from the Racing Beat 3 rotor 900 HP tur= bo engine project.  I think this is so far removed from what we are doi= ng that it's not applicable, even if true.
 
BTW, The EC2 does use port timed injection.
 
Tracy

--B_3189181551_17914237--