Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=207.217.120.180; envelope-from=j-winddesigns@thegrid.net
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 14:47:50 -0500
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: P Port fuel Injection
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-2--819348339
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552)
From: Jerry Hey <j-winddesigns@thegrid.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
In-Reply-To: <list-616550@logan.com>
Message-Id: <552C6196-6BE5-11D9-8ED4-0003931B0C7A@thegrid.net>


--Apple-Mail-2--819348339
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=ISO-8859-1;
	format=flowed

The p port issue as addressed the other list is full of doctored=20
numbers, bogus performance claims, weird assumptions and strange=20
conclusions, not to mention far fetched designs that will never, ever=20
be built.   Jerry


On Friday, January 21, 2005, at 02:36  PM, Tracy Crook wrote:

> =A0
> =A0
> I'd bet that the better BSFC with remoted injectors that's hyped on =
the
> other list was only achieved (wasn't the info from the Mazda factory
> racing program?) with perfect injector placement & timing based on =
more
> testing than any of us can do in our proverbial garages. (Is injector
> timing variable on Tracy's or any other injection controller out=20
> there?)
>
> =A0>=46rom one neophite to another....
>
> Charlie
> I think that better BSFC report was from the Racing Beat 3 rotor 900=20=

> HP turbo engine project.=A0 I think this is so far removed from what =
we=20
> are doing that it's not applicable, even if true.
> =A0
> BTW, The EC2 does use port timed injection.
> =A0
> Tracy

--Apple-Mail-2--819348339
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/enriched;
	charset=ISO-8859-1

The p port issue as addressed the other list is full of doctored
numbers, bogus performance claims, weird assumptions and strange
conclusions, not to mention far fetched designs that will never, ever
be built.   Jerry


=20

On Friday, January 21, 2005, at 02:36  PM, Tracy Crook wrote:


<excerpt>=A0

=A0

I'd bet that the better BSFC with remoted injectors that's hyped on the

other list was only achieved (wasn't the info from the Mazda factory

racing program?) with perfect injector placement & timing based on more

testing than any of us can do in our proverbial garages. (Is injector

timing variable on Tracy's or any other injection controller out
there?)


=A0>=46rom one neophite to another....


Charlie

I think that better BSFC report was from the Racing Beat 3 rotor 900
HP turbo engine project.=A0 I think this is so far removed from what we
are doing that it's not applicable, even if true.

=A0

BTW, The EC2 does use port timed injection.

=A0

Tracy

</excerpt>=

--Apple-Mail-2--819348339--