Return-Path: <dale.r@cox.net>
Received: from fed1rmmtao03.cox.net ([68.230.241.36] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.8)
  with ESMTP id 616462 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 13:54:41 -0500
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.36; envelope-from=dale.r@cox.net
Received: from smtp.west.cox.net ([172.18.180.58]) by fed1rmmtao03.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-117-20041022) with SMTP
          id <20050121185411.MYPK8778.fed1rmmtao03.cox.net@smtp.west.cox.net>
          for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>;
          Fri, 21 Jan 2005 13:54:11 -0500
X-Mailer: Openwave WebEngine, version 2.8.15 (webedge20-101-1103-20040528)
From: Dale Rogers <dale.r@cox.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] 'netiquette (was Re: Two 550???)
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 13:54:11 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20050121185411.MYPK8778.fed1rmmtao03.cox.net@smtp.west.cox.net>

Jerry Hey <j-winddesigns@thegrid.net> wrote:

> Somebody please tell me:  should I reply at the top or bottom of the 
> previous message?.
 
Jerry,

   This board seems to be nearly evenly divided between "top  
posters" and "bottom fee^H^H^H posters".  Here's my take on 
'NETiquette:

If one's habit is to edit down the previous post to the 
essentials of the specific points one wants to address, then 
bottom posting is appropriate.  If, on the other hand, one's  
normal practice is to include the previous seven postings to 
a thread - in their entirety - in one's own post, then 
please, PLEASE, top-post.  

Dale R.
COZY MKIV #1254