Return-Path: <cardmarc@charter.net>
Received: from mxsf30.cluster1.charter.net ([209.225.28.230] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.8)
  with ESMTP id 616122 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:51:50 -0500
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.225.28.230; envelope-from=cardmarc@charter.net
Received: from mxip20.cluster1.charter.net (mxip20a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.150])
	by mxsf30.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j0LFpJdp009891
	for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:51:20 -0500
Received: from fep05.charter.net (HELO 209.225.8.224) (209.225.8.85)
  by mxip20.cluster1.charter.net with SMTP; 21 Jan 2005 10:51:20 -0500
Message-Id: <3k70il$jcheeo@mxip20a.cluster1.charter.net>
X-Ironport-AV: i="3.88,145,1102309200"; 
   d="scan'208"; a="650688984:sNHT15953318"
X-Mailer: Openwave WebEngine, version 2.8.12 (webedge20-101-197-20030912)
From: <cardmarc@charter.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Racemate pump/alternator perhaps a viable option?
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:51:19 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit