Return-Path: Received: from imo-m20.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.1] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.8) with ESMTP id 615956 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:17:55 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.1; envelope-from=Lehanover@aol.com Received: from Lehanover@aol.com by imo-m20.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id q.1a8.2f9b489f (4362) for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:17:22 -0500 (EST) From: Lehanover@aol.com Message-ID: <1a8.2f9b489f.2f225ae2@aol.com> Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:17:22 EST Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: front rotor damage To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 138 In a message dated 1/20/2005 9:02:17 PM Central Standard Time, atlasyts@bellsouth.net writes: << Greetings, > > I'm just starting to clean up the reusable parts, and found some damage on the > front (good) rotor. Attached are some pics that show the damage. Try as I > might, I can't see any signs of damage to the rotor housing, which is hard to > believe. I'd sure think the force required to dent in a steel rotor, would at > least make a mark on an aluminum housing. This is typical of new product. A tooling mark and part of a casting void. Nothing to worry about at all. Lynn E. Hanover