Return-Path: Received: from mail24.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.133.165] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.8) with ESMTP-TLS id 615811 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 01:34:01 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=211.29.133.165; envelope-from=lendich@optusnet.com.au Received: from george (d220-236-50-60.dsl.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.236.50.60] (may be forged)) by mail24.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j0L6XQ6p031070 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 17:33:28 +1100 Message-ID: <001a01c4ff83$5eb73480$3c32ecdc@george> From: "George Lendich" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: P Port fuel Injection Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:35:16 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Jerry, Using Ken's ready reckoner - NO! More like 800cc.- 220 HP ( a big one) 43 PSI, .55BSFC. .8 Duty cycle I will use Ed Anderson's method later to check that. Using Hen's RR is a quick and dirty method, but seems to work OK! www.rceng.com/technical.htmlWORKSHEET You can also play with BSFC to see the difference etc. George (down under) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jerry Hey" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 11:54 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: P Port fuel Injection > Ed, glad you made it over to fly rotary. This is a great place to > kick some ideas around. That is interesting news from micro tech. > Maybe we can get George to do a practice calculation for us. He is > learning faster than I am. George? If you are tempted, the numbers > would be 550 cc/220 hp/6000 rpm . Thanks, Jerry > > > > On Thursday, January 20, 2005, at 08:41 PM, Ed Klepeis wrote: > > > Jerry > > When I called mico tech they said one 550cc injector per runner > > would do the job. I think I just might make mine up with only one per > > runner. Can you ask around and get some opinions on this size injector > > and will they think it would work before I would consider buying them. > > I guess if we wanted an expert opinion we could ask master paul HaHa I > > don't think I could put up with his answer.thanks > > Regards > > Ed > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jerry Hey" > > > > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > > Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 6:25 PM > > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: P Port fuel Injection > > > > > >> Exactly, the point. We need to test our concepts. This one I am > >> very optimistic about but you never know......... > >> > >> What do you think of Paul L's Dyno? I plan to build one once the > >> engine is ready to test. Jerry > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thursday, January 20, 2005, at 11:59 AM, WRJJRS@aol.com wrote: > >> > >>> Jerry, > >>> The manifolds of many of the newer cars are very convoluted. The > >>> injection tends to be within about 4" of the port though. The > >>> original inot the bell injection was used on car with a total inlet > >>> length of less than 6". You are in uncharted territory on injecting > >>> upstream. There is little info to be had, you will just have to try > >>> it. > >>> Bill Jepson > >>> > >>>>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >>>>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > >>> > >> > >> > >>>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >>>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > > > > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >