Return-Path: <canarder@frontiernet.net>
Received: from relay04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.131.37] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5)
  with ESMTP id 591914 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 01:10:21 -0500
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.133.131.37; envelope-from=canarder@frontiernet.net
Received: from filter02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (filter02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.131.177])
	by relay04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C4D21002D
	for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Wed,  5 Jan 2005 06:09:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from relay04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.131.37])
	by filter02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (filter02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.131.177]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with LMTP id 28855-12-94 for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>;
	Wed, 5 Jan 2005 06:09:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (70-97-234-61.dsl2.cok.tn.frontiernet.net [70.97.234.61])
	by relay04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BA95FEC3
	for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Wed,  5 Jan 2005 06:09:50 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <41DB8526.8060806@frontiernet.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 00:11:50 -0600
From: Jim Sower <canarder@frontiernet.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040514
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: IAS and Vne! Whoa!
References: <list-591219@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-591219@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0501-0, 01/04/2005), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20040701 (2.0) at filter02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net

Actually, I've been given to understand that *both* IAS and TAS are a 
factor.  I don't know exactly what the relationship is, just that they 
both come into play.
But now I've  told you more than I know ... Jim S.

John Slade wrote:

>  > Apparently Vne is NOT, it is a factor of True Airspeed!!  
> That's contrary to what I've read with respect to canard pushers, Ed.
> As I understand it VNE for the Cozy, for example, is 220 mph IAS.
> It's all to do with how many air molecules are hitting the airplane.
> Someone tell me I'm wrong. ???
>  
> John
>  
>  
>