Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.31; envelope-from=rogersda@cox.net
From: Dale Rogers <rogersda@cox.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Bubbles in fuel line from pump - new valve
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 11:16:49 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20041127161647.BAGV9706.fed1rmmtao08.cox.net@smtp.west.cox.net>

Is that really enough?  What's your actual flow rate - not 
just the burn rate - at "war emergency" power?  I would 
think that good engineering practice is to have a supply 
capacity that exceeded that flow by about 20%.

Dale R.
COZY MkIV #1254

 
> From: Finn Lassen <finn.lassen@verizon.net>
> Date: 2004/11/27 Sat AM 10:16:52 EST
> To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Bubbles in fuel line from pump - new valve
> 
> That's right. Oddly enough it will gravity flow about 17 GPH through 
> that hole.
> 
> Finn
> 
> Bulent Aliev wrote:
> 
> >>The inlet hole to the flow sensor turbine is only 1/8" !
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >Finn, are you saying that all the fuel going to the engine has to be sucked
> >through an 1/8" hole? If that's the case, this could be your problem?
> >Bulent
> >  
> >
> 
>