Return-Path: Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net ([204.127.198.35] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 542967 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:09:25 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.198.35; envelope-from=jesse@jessfarr.com Received: from office5 (pcp04959909pcs.midval01.tn.comcast.net[68.59.199.44]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with SMTP id <20041123140855013004r6dqe>; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:08:55 +0000 Message-ID: <047501c4d165$ed76e270$057ba8c0@farr.com> From: "jesse farr" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: MMO Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:08:09 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0467_01C4D13B.F3BAD580" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0467_01C4D13B.F3BAD580 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MessageHeck, fellers, MMO just smell better, even when burned. jofarr, soddy tn ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Russell Duffy=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 8:29 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: MMO But FWIW, I use a 50/50 mixture of any good TCW-3 oil and MMO in my = fuel. The MMO was selected for it's ability to keep seals from sticking = in their grooves. I have no idea what ingredient is responsible. =20 Tracy=20 Hi Tracy, Interesting to hear you say this, because I had almost decided to do = the same thing, purely because I can't find a consensus of whether TCW-3 = or MMO was better. I think it may well be the case that each has some = advantages. By mixing like this, you're using the MMO at nearly the = concentration they recommend, and making up the rest of the 1oz/gal with = TCW-3. =20 I have to ask though, are you mixing these because you feel like the = mixture (solution, whatever ) performs better, or because you like = MMO, but realize TCW-3 is cheaper. In other words, if cost were no = factor, would you just run straight MMO?=20 Thanks, Rusty (curious minds need to buy oil)=20 ------=_NextPart_000_0467_01C4D13B.F3BAD580 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
Heck, fellers, MMO just smell better, = even when=20 burned.
jofarr, soddy tn
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Russell=20 Duffy
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, = 2004 8:29=20 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = MMO

But FWIW, I use a 50/50 = mixture of any=20 good TCW-3 oil and MMO in my fuel.  The MMO was selected for it's = ability=20 to keep seals from sticking in their grooves.  I have no = idea what=20 ingredient  is responsible.   
 
 Tracy 
 
Hi = Tracy,
 
Interesting to hear you say this, because I = had almost=20 decided to do the same thing, purely because I can't find a consensus = of=20 whether TCW-3 or MMO was better.  I think it may well be = the case=20 that each has some advantages.  By mixing like this, you're using = the MMO=20 at nearly the concentration they recommend, and making up the = rest of the=20 1oz/gal with=20 TCW-3.  
 
I have to=20 ask though, are you mixing these because you feel like the = mixture=20 (solution, whatever <g>) performs better, or because = you like=20 MMO, but realize TCW-3 is cheaper.  In other words, if cost were = no=20 factor, would you just run straight=20 MMO? 
 
Thanks,
Rusty=20 (curious minds need to buy = oil) 
 
  
=
------=_NextPart_000_0467_01C4D13B.F3BAD580--