Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.102] (HELO ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 540772 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 10:46:59 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.102; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com Received: from edward2 (cpe-069-132-109-019.carolina.rr.com [69.132.109.19]) by ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id iALFkRkd012057 for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 10:46:28 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <001301c4cfe1$47576e80$2402a8c0@edward2> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: MMO vs 2-cycle (was Re: how do you carry, and measure oil?) Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 10:46:34 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Marvel Mystery Oil (MMO) Ed Anderson ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob White" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2004 10:34 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: MMO vs 2-cycle (was Re: how do you carry, and measure oil?) > OK, I give up. I thought after a few comments I could figure it out, > but what is MMO exactly? > > Bob White > > On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 08:39:27 -0600 > "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > I have used the MMO/2 cycle mix in the past but for the last 100 > > hours I > > have been using the Wal-Mart Marine 2 cycle oil. After reading up on > > the different classifications of 2 cycle oil (most brands are all in > > one now) and looking at the temperature profiles for the apex seals I > > concluded that almost anything would do a better job than crankcase > > oil of lubricating the seals. And 2 cycle certainly leaves less > > residue than crankcase oil. > > > > Mornin' Ed, > > > > Is MMO and 2-cycle oil close to the same thing? When I try to > > rationalize using one over the other, I come up with one other issue. > > Our pre-mix oil does get scavenged into the crankcase to some extent. > > MMO is made to be used in fuel, and oil, so that's not a problem. I > > can't say that I've ever heard anyone comment on the effect that > > 2-cycle oil has in our crankcase. I've wondered if this alone is a > > reason to prefer MMO over 2-cycle oil. > > > > Another question just came to me. Does oil injection cause oil to be > > scavenged into the crankcase? I'm assuming it would be less than what > > we get with pre-mix, though some must make the trek. I wonder if > > Mazda considered that when deciding to use crankcase oil for the apex > > seals? Of course originally, they weren't using the dripper > > injectors, but rather injecting the oil into the fuel/air stream at > > the carb. > > > > Cheers, > > Rusty > > > > > > > > > > > -- > http://www.bob-white.com > N93BD - Rotary Powered BD-4 (soon) > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >