Return-Path: Received: from pimout2-ext.prodigy.net ([207.115.63.101] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.4) with ESMTP id 456103 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 09:34:54 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=207.115.63.101; envelope-from=DELTAFLYER@prodigy.net Received: from enroll02.prodigy.net (enroll02-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.61.26]) by pimout2-ext.prodigy.net (8.12.10 milter /8.12.10) with SMTP id i97DYOxQ290166 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 09:34:24 -0400 To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Message-Id: Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 09:34:23 -0500 From: DELTAFLYER@prodigy.net Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: #$!%@$ temperatures still high A coffee cup and an electric immersion heater will get you easily portable boiling water. Jim --- Original Message --- From: "Steve Brooks" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: #$!%@$ temperatures still high >Re: [FlyRotary] Re: #$!%@$ temperatures still highJoe, >I was trying to think of a good way to do this test while in the plane, and >outside of a camp stove or something to boil the water, it would be pretty >hard to do. I don't think that pulling them to test would be too difficult, >plus the sensor resistance goes down as it gets hotter, so any additional >resistance in the ground, or the wiring would make the gauge read cooler, >not hotter. > >I think that I'll test it first out of the plane and see what I get, I can >also measure the resistance at boiling, and then run the plane to the same >reading and check the resistance of the sensor there, just to validate the >readings. > >Steve > -----Original Message----- > From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]On >Behalf Of Joe Hull > Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 7:48 PM > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: #$!%@$ temperatures still high > > > On 10/6/04 6:46 PM, "Steve Brooks" wrote: > > Mark, > You raise a good point. I'm pretty confident in the oil side of the >equation. The digital readout is aircraft certified, and the specs are +- >1/2 degree. The sender is also aircraft type. The water temp is >automotive. Its anyone's guess how accurate it is. The sensors aren't real >expensive, so I may just order another one, and see what I get. > The engine doesn't seem to be really hot when I land, which also makes me >wonder about the accuracy. > > With that said, I also think that my air flow through the oil cooler is a >little on the low side. I don't want to rob any more form the coolant side, >so another scoop seems to be the answer. > > Steve > > > Steve, can't you put the sender in boiling water and see what do you read? >Many gauges have adjustments on the back and you can compensate if the >reading is off. > bulent > > > > Steve - > > Make sure you do this (hot water test) while the sender and gauge are >attached in the plane. If there is a "ground loop" problem (i.e. significant >difference in resistance between sender to ground and gauge to ground) you >might be getting an error that way too. If you test them out of the plane >they may check out OK but in the plane they may have this additional error. > > > > Just a thot! > > Joe Hull