Return-Path: Received: from imf17aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.65] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2) with ESMTP id 381586 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 17:36:00 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.65; envelope-from=pmrobert@bellsouth.net Received: from mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.157]) by imf17aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.08 201-253-122-130-108-20031117) with SMTP id <20040827213531.BEPP1758.imf17aec.mail.bellsouth.net@mail.bellsouth.net> for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 17:35:31 -0400 X-Mailer: Openwave WebEngine, version 2.8.15 (webedge20-101-1103-20040528) X-Originating-IP: [65.12.218.16] From: To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Engine run Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 17:35:31 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20040827213531.BEPP1758.imf17aec.mail.bellsouth.net@mail.bellsouth.net> > > From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> > Date: 2004/08/27 Fri PM 04:21:50 EDT > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Engine run > > A cheap fuel filter, translucent generic type, and a MIG jet in line with > your MAP sensor will work wonders in smoothing the MAP reading. Basically a > mechanical RC filter. I use this in my auto installation and wouldn't run > without it! > I use manifold-filter-jet-MAP sensor. This works well. I haven't tried it the other way. -Mike > -Mike > > Interesting, and probably worth trying. Does it matter what order these are > in? In other words, is it manifold-jet-filter-sensor, or > manifold-filter-jet-sensor ? I wish I had sensor to hook up, and watch with > a scope, to see just how bad it is. > > Thanks, > Rusty (too many experiments) > > > > > > >