Return-Path: Received: from pop3.olsusa.com ([63.150.212.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.7) with ESMTP id 802796 for rob@logan.com; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 14:31:11 -0400 Received: from wind.imbris.com ([216.18.130.7]) by pop3.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71175U5500L550S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 13:24:09 -0400 Received: from regandesigns.com (cda131-79.imbris.com [216.18.131.79]) by wind.imbris.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f5NHWU510776 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 10:32:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3B34D200.9D7E03B@regandesigns.com> Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 10:29:36 -0700 From: "Hamid A. Wasti" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Subject: Re: 80, 78, 76, 72 Useable? References: <5.1.0.14.2.20010623100150.042ec250@pop3.olsusa.com> <003601c0fc01$b07b2080$14e4de9e@colwell> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> It is very important to know the useable fuel in the tanks. IT IS NOT THE SAME AS THE FUEL TANK CAPACITY. Even in certified airplanes, especially the geriatric variety that some of us fly, it is not always the same as the published "useable fuel" numbers. I am one of the people who came close to finding this out the hard way. I had owned my previous Mooney for 2 years and knew everything about it, or so I thought. I had never flown any flights longer than about 3.5 hours (35-40 gallons of fuel), just because the need never arose. I was flying from CA to FL and the first leg was planned to use 45 of the 52 gallons in the tank. I knew it held 52 gallons because I had personally observed a little over 52 gallons being pumped into the tanks after they were emptied to replace the quick drain valves. I was aware that I was pushing the envelope and monitored my progress closely to make sure that I was getting the ground speed I had planned. All was good until I got a wakeup call when the first tank dried up prematurely over eastern Arizona in the middle of nowhere. The nearest airport was my planned fuel stop. It made for some very stressful minutes of flying till I landed at my destination. The tank that had "dried up" still had 2 gallons of fuel in it. The other tank had 4 (2 usable, I hoped). The fuel consumption was on the money, 45 gallons planned, 46 actually used. When I got my current plane, before I made any flights that would dip into the last 10 gallons (even for planned reserve), I intentionally ran each of the tanks dry (on separate flights :-) to see how much useable fuel they held. This useable figure is for straight and level flight only and I require another 4 gallons in one tank for landing. And that is in a certified airplane. A homebuilt would require at least that much testing. Before running tanks dry in the air, you must determine if your engine will restart in the air. Certified planes have to be designed to restart when the fuel flow is restored. It may or may not be true for your plane. Hamid >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>