Return-Path: Received: from hotmail.com ([216.33.241.206]) by ns1.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-64832U3500L350S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 20:35:18 -0400 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 17:42:40 -0700 Received: from 63.67.151.2 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 00:42:39 GMT From: "Eric Parlow" To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Subject: Delthawk / GAP Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 00:42:39 GMT Message-ID: X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Jeff, I may not go with them (Deltahawk) if they are an option, but they sure did seem to have a lot of positives. Of course, I didn't get the con side last night. A-- the Deltahawk is a very good concept. The TCM GAP is also a two-stroke, Jet-A, compression ignition engine. The major difference being the type of scavenging. The Deltahawk is loop-scavenged and the TCM GAP is Uni-flow. The loop-scavenged design uses piston ports for both intake and exhaust. The Uni-flow design uses piston ports for intake but four exhaust poppet valves for exhaust. The Uni-flow design trades off complexity for better flow and efficiency. ERic-- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>