Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #70610
From: PETER WILLIAMS <peterpawaviation@hotmail.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: TRAIN OR DIE here it is again, again PART 2
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 07:59:42 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
PART II

People who knew Steve noted that he was a risk taker with active hobbies such as scuba diving, surfing, motorcycling, and off-road car racing. These are not inherently dangerous per se, but it’s not a Bingo game or bird watching. He seriously injured himself and totaled an Extra 300 when the ground intervened at the bottom of a loop. That brush with mortality might have encouraged a more conservative approach—but apparently it did not.
[EVEN A HIGHLY EXPERIENCED PILOT]
Steve was a highly experienced pilot with an estimated 3,600 hours total time, including a fair amount in turbine aircraft but only about 13 hours in the turbine IV-TP. He resisted getting transition training in the IV-TP.
There’s a strong case to be made for transition training. Pilots involved in accidents generally have less experience in make and model, often despite high total time.

AND I ONLY CAN WISH

The NTSB noted that the FAA had issued a warning letter to operators in 2009:

“The notice indicated that while Lancairs represented a little over 3 percent of the amateur-built experimental aircraft fleet, they contributed to 16 percent of all amateur-built fatal aircraft accidents in the prior 11 months…”

Let me point out Lancair is not the only high performance experimental aircraft with aggressive stall characteristics. The FAA had also proposed a special training requirement as has been done on several other aircraft that had relatively high accident involvements. That has yet to be enacted.


by  AOPA
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster