X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 07:46:03 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-6793615@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <edmartintx@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ie0-f175.google.com ([209.85.223.175] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.9e)
  with ESMTPS id 6793120; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 15:58:03 -0400
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.223.175; envelope-from=edmartintx@gmail.com
Received: by mail-ie0-f175.google.com with SMTP id to1so4580369ieb.34
        for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:57:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.62.104 with SMTP id x8mr7954849igr.37.1395604647179; Sun,
 23 Mar 2014 12:57:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.227.42 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:57:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 15:57:27 -0400
X-Original-Message-ID: <CAPZSM6X9R2_mPbh5HCO3YtGDHAcz1z0S=_AZhZ8mC6LOpByKdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Legacy in Formation Flying
From: ED MARTIN <edmartintx@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: LANCAIR MAILING LIST <lml@lancaironline.net>, LANCAIR MAILING LIST <Marv@Lancair.net>, 
	LANCAIR MAILING LIST <marvkaye@lancaironline.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bdc1bd03dfbf004f54b8791

--047d7bdc1bd03dfbf004f54b8791
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

*Greetings Lancair Legacy Flyers, *

         *Recently, I have flown formation with a gaggle of aircraft
(non-Lancair) that have some differences in performance.   I would like to
hear from Lancair Legacy pilots that have experience in formation flying.
Specifically, what are your **opinions, experiences and recommendations
regarding mixed formation flying??   And the same question
regarding approaches at LESS than 100 KIAS on final approach??   Especially
behind another aircraft that generates a known significant wake
turbulence??     There are many Legacy pilots that have experience
in formation flying with similar and dissimilar aircraft types.  Please
share your advice and experience.  Thank you all.   *

*Regards, Ed Martin *
*N767EM*

--047d7bdc1bd03dfbf004f54b8791
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div><strong>Greetings Lancair=A0Legacy=A0Flyers, </strong=
></div><div><br></div><div>=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0<strong>Recently, I h=
ave flown formation=A0with a gaggle of aircraft (non-Lancair) that have som=
e differences in performance.=A0=A0 I would like to hear from=A0Lancair Leg=
acy pilots that have experience in formation flying.=A0=A0 Specifically, wh=
at are your </strong><strong>opinions, experiences and recommendations rega=
rding mixed formation flying??=A0=A0=A0And the same question regarding=A0ap=
proaches at <em><u><font color=3D"#0000ff">LESS than 100 KIAS</font></u></e=
m> on final approach??=A0=A0 Especially behind another aircraft that genera=
tes a=A0known significant wake turbulence?? =A0=A0=A0 There are=A0many Lega=
cy pilots that have experience in=A0formation flying=A0with similar and dis=
similar aircraft types.=A0 Please share your advice and experience.=A0 Than=
k you all.=A0=A0 </strong></div>
<div><strong></strong><br></div><div><strong>Regards, Ed Martin </strong></=
div><div><strong>N767EM</strong></div>
</div>

--047d7bdc1bd03dfbf004f54b8791--