X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 15:04:26 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from blu0-omc3-s35.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.116.110] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.9e) with ESMTP id 6787286 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 13:04:46 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.55.116.110; envelope-from=gary21sn@hotmail.com Received: from BLU172-DS15 ([65.55.116.73]) by blu0-omc3-s35.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 19 Mar 2014 10:04:14 -0700 X-TMN: [DrylIIMo/D9Eq7PtxyTfq+I9vNDvGawb] X-Originating-Email: [gary21sn@hotmail.com] X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: gary21sn@hotmail.com From: "Gary Edwards" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: L360 bob weight X-Original-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 10:04:13 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01E6_01CF435A.94D246C0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: MSN 9 X-MimeOLE: Produced By MSN MimeOLE V10.50.0019.1000 Seal-Send-Time: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 10:04:13 -0700 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Mar 2014 17:04:14.0157 (UTC) FILETIME=[4149AFD0:01CF4395] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_01E6_01CF435A.94D246C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =20 Interesting, as Don suggested installing the bob weight for my 235/320. = It's been in since day one. All 320 mods, no wing extensions. =20 Gary LNC2 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Earl Gmail=20 To: lml@lancaironline.net=20 Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 9:44 AM Subject: [LML] Re: L360 bob weight Ditto what Leighton wrote... Especially his last sentence. (g) Re: 235/320 small tail, no bob weight with all the 320 mods and wing = extensions suggested by Don years ago. Earl =20 =20 On Mar 19, 2014, at 9:34 AM, "Leighton Mangels" = > wrote: =20 When I was building my first Lancair, a 360 with one of the first "big = tails", back in the early '90's, Don Goetz suggested not to install the = bob weight so I didn't. I never discussed the "why or why not" with him = and never missed it. I don't know if the same suggestion applied to the = original tail. I learned early on not to argue with the Don. =20 Leighton Mangels ------=_NextPart_000_01E6_01CF435A.94D246C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =20
Interesting, as Don suggested installing the bob weight for my=20 235/320.  It's been in since day one.  All 320 mods, no wing=20 extensions.
 
Gary
LNC2
-----=20 Original Message -----
From:=20 Earl=20 Gmail
Sent:=20 Wednesday, March 19, 2014 9:44 AM
Subject:=20 [LML] Re: L360 bob weight

Ditto what Leighton wrote... Especially his last sentence. = (g)
Re: 235/320 small tail, no bob weight with all the 320 mods and = wing=20 extensions suggested by Don years ago. Earl




On Mar 19, 2014, at 9:34 AM, "Leighton Mangels" <leighton@teleport.com>=20 wrote:

=20 =20
When I was building my first = Lancair, a 360=20 with one of the first "big tails", back in the early '90's, Don = Goetz=20 suggested not to install the bob weight so I didn't.  I never = discussed=20 the "why or why not" with him and never missed it.  I don't = know if the=20 same suggestion applied to the original tail.  I learned early = on not=20 to argue with the Don.
 
Leighton=20 = Mangels
------=_NextPart_000_01E6_01CF435A.94D246C0--