X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 12:44:13 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail-qc0-f182.google.com ([209.85.216.182] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.9e) with ESMTPS id 6787187 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 12:13:10 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.216.182; envelope-from=n233ee@gmail.com Received: by mail-qc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id e16so10057704qcx.13 for ; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 09:12:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.31.6 with SMTP id e6mr3520285qge.101.1395245556485; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 09:12:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from ?IPv6:2602:304:b10e:69:e19a:f424:4de9:b428? ([2602:304:b10e:69:e19a:f424:4de9:b428]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id s61sm1926500qge.11.2014.03.19.09.12.35 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 19 Mar 2014 09:12:35 -0700 (PDT) References: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-BE7A55A9-3A0A-4AE9-9D80-5B95DEB2CB38 X-Original-Message-Id: <4805504B-1DCC-45DF-BBCE-B68379436B6F@gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: iPad Mail (11D167) From: Earl Gmail Subject: Re: [LML] L360 bob weight X-Original-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 11:12:35 -0500 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List --Apple-Mail-BE7A55A9-3A0A-4AE9-9D80-5B95DEB2CB38 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ditto what Leighton wrote... Especially his last sentence. (g) Re: 235/320 small tail, no bob weight with all the 320 mods and wing extensi= ons suggested by Don years ago. Earl > On Mar 19, 2014, at 9:34 AM, "Leighton Mangels" wr= ote: >=20 > When I was building my first Lancair, a 360 with one of the first "big tai= ls", back in the early '90's, Don Goetz suggested not to install the bob wei= ght so I didn't. I never discussed the "why or why not" with him and never m= issed it. I don't know if the same suggestion applied to the original tail.= I learned early on not to argue with the Don. > =20 > Leighton Mangels --Apple-Mail-BE7A55A9-3A0A-4AE9-9D80-5B95DEB2CB38 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Ditto what Leighton wrote... Especiall= y his last sentence. (g)
Re: 235/320 small tail, no bob weight wit= h all the 320 mods and wing extensions suggested by Don years ago. Earl
<= br>


=



On Mar 19, 2014, at 9:34 AM, "Leighton Mangels" <leighton@teleport.com> wrote:

When I was building my first Lancair, a= 360 with=20 one of the first "big tails", back in the early '90's, Don Goetz suggested n= ot=20 to install the bob weight so I didn't.  I never discussed the "why or w= hy=20 not" with him and never missed it.  I don't know if the same suggestion= =20 applied to the original tail.  I learned early on not to argue with the= =20 Don.
 
Leighton Mangels
= --Apple-Mail-BE7A55A9-3A0A-4AE9-9D80-5B95DEB2CB38--