X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 10:08:44 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from col0-omc3-s15.col0.hotmail.com ([65.55.34.153] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.9e) with ESMTP id 6786741 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 08:48:41 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.55.34.153; envelope-from=peterpawaviation@hotmail.com Received: from COL129-W77 ([65.55.34.137]) by col0-omc3-s15.col0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 19 Mar 2014 05:48:09 -0700 X-TMN: [HyOFGAYm32cMC743mQ6GXVzrjQLAqQbN] X-Originating-Email: [peterpawaviation@hotmail.com] X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: peterpawaviation@hotmail.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_f4081f95-1fca-4c10-9cc3-a839b4845285_" From: PETER WILLIAMS X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: RE: [LML] 55x Lnc2 X-Original-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 08:48:08 -0400 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Mar 2014 12:48:09.0567 (UTC) FILETIME=[7B474EF0:01CF4371] --_f4081f95-1fca-4c10-9cc3-a839b4845285_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable HI THERE i have had 55x in three different airplanes=3B it works well and is relativ= ely reliable. the back lit display tends to fail=3B which does not effect operation=2C ju= st the ease of viewing. but why? the whole Stec system is a small fortune=2C=20 MAYBE you use the servos and the installation from the "30"? that woul= d mitigate a great majority of the conversion costs. just don't need too mu= ch from Stec. and a "minor" repair at Stec cost $1=2C420 and a major costs about $2=2C400= but if you want it in a timely fashion that is another $400 what about going to the Dynon or the Garmin for experimentals. you get a wh= ole lot of value and the cost is in the $5=2C000 to 8=2C000 range=2C and th= at is for everything that drives the autopilot=20 AND you have a brand new glass screen display and this from someone=2C me=2C who has a yellow tag 55x panel unit for sale peter by the by=20 when Stec was approached by a dealer with a major multy unit order=2C Stec = would not sell install packages without the panel unit. OH=2C they would s= ell it at list price for all the separate pieces=2C thus making the cost sa= ving non existent=20 > Tree o: lml@lancaironline.net > Date: Wed=2C 19 Mar 2014 08:08:06 -0400 > From: toddlong1@gmail.com > Subject: [LML] 55x Lnc2 >=20 > Anyone have a 55x in their lnc2. If so how does it perform? Especially in= pitch. Thinking of upgrading a 30 to a 55x.=20 >=20 > Sent from my iPhone > -- > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.ht= ml = --_f4081f95-1fca-4c10-9cc3-a839b4845285_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

HI THERE

i have had 55x i= n three different airplanes=3B it works well and is relatively reliable.
the back lit display tends to fail=3B which does not effect operation= =2C just the ease of viewing.

but why?

the whole Stec system = is a small fortune=2C

MAYBE
=3B =3B =3B =3B&nbs= p=3B =3B =3B =3B =3B =3B you use the servos and the ins= tallation from the "30"? that would mitigate a great majority of the conver= sion costs. just don't need too much from Stec.
and a "minor" repair at = Stec cost $1=2C420 and a major costs about $2=2C400 but if you want it in a= timely fashion that is another $400

what about going to the Dynon o= r the Garmin for experimentals. you get a whole lot of value and the cost i= s in the $5=2C000 to 8=2C000 range=2C and that is for everything that drive= s the autopilot
=3B =3B =3B =3B =3B =3B = =3B =3B =3B =3B =3B =3B =3B =3B =3B =3B= =3B =3B =3B =3B =3B =3B AND you have a brand new g= lass screen display

and this from someone=2C me=2C who has a yellow = tag 55x panel unit for sale

peter

by the by
when Stec was= approached by a dealer with a major multy unit order=2C Stec would not sel= l =3B install packages without the panel unit. OH=2C they would sell it= at list price for all the separate pieces=2C thus making the cost saving n= on existent

>=3B Tree o: lml@lancaironline.net
&g= t=3B Date: Wed=2C 19 Mar 2014 08:08:06 -0400
>=3B From: toddlong1@gmai= l.com
>=3B Subject: [LML] 55x Lnc2
>=3B
>=3B Anyone have a = 55x in their lnc2. If so how does it perform? Especially in pitch. Thinking= of upgrading a 30 to a 55x.
>=3B
>=3B Sent from my iPhone
&= gt=3B --
>=3B For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/= lists/lml/List.html

= --_f4081f95-1fca-4c10-9cc3-a839b4845285_--