Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #69502
From: Paul Miller <pjdmiller@gmail.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Autopilot servos and L360 bobweight
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 10:07:48 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Silvio, the servos are not really altitude sensitive but if you have a pitch trim that has reduced voltage for speed reduction, that can be suspect.  At altitude try and see if pitch trim operates by gently holding very light pitch up or pitch down while in altitude hold mode. You should get a response within a second or two from pitch trim.  Without pitch trim, you cannot control pitch.  Have you a reduced trim speed potentiometer?

Paul
Legacy tru trak

On 2014-03-19, at 8:07, Silvio Novelli <ppxsn@novellisouza.com.br> wrote:

I also have a problem with my Tru Trak, it is not able to hold altitude above 9000 ft. Any comments? Bob weight is there to better stick force. My recommendation is to keep it. 

      Silvio Novelli
 Lancair 320 PP-XSN
+55 (14) 9.9614-3129




On 18  Jan 2014,w 12, at 11:41 AM, John Barrett wrote:

Bob weight is there to balance the control surface . Out of balance can carry risk of flutter.  Be sure to research before changing that relationship.

John

Sent from my iPad


On Mar 18, 2014, at 6:52 AM, "Jack Dysart" <jldysart1@gmail.com> wrote:

My Tru Trak autopilot altitude hold is inconsistent, and opinions are that the servo had difficulty working properly because of the mass of the bobweight on the elevator idler arm.  One possibility is to remove the weight and expect more pitch sensitivity (lighter stick force) in turns.  Has anyone found other alternatives?

What if the mass of the bobweight is reduced?

 

My servo is behind the seat and connected to a ring clamp on the elevator control tube with a smaller, roughly parallel, rod with bearing ends.

 

Jack Dysart    


Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster