X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 12:38:19 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-6666004@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <dballin@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-qc0-f178.google.com ([209.85.216.178] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.8)
  with ESMTPS id 6665824 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 11:32:51 -0500
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.216.178; envelope-from=dballin@gmail.com
Received: by mail-qc0-f178.google.com with SMTP id i17so13588994qcy.37
        for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 08:32:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.224.28.72 with SMTP id l8mr135157762qac.35.1388680336201;
 Thu, 02 Jan 2014 08:32:16 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.89.233 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 08:31:46 -0800 (PST)
Reply-To: dballin@gmail.com
From: Dan Ballin <dballin@gmail.com>
X-Original-Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 08:31:46 -0800
X-Original-Message-ID: <CAB9TjL-xHvxs5w=8xUR1oZYsHUNf3r5v5x3mB1eU9fh9=GDvsA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Legacy Takeoff Performance at High Elevation Airports?
X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List <lml@lancaironline.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Valin

I don't have a lot of experience in my Legacy, but GW is really key as
is landing speed.  It would be interesting to see what the sim model
does with that.  What do they have the EW as ?  Seems like most are
coming in around 16-1700 - which is heavier than Lancair's 99L.

I fly out of Bend (KBDN) 3500' elev 5000' runway and we get to 5-6000
DA routinely in the summer.  At GW 2400, I am comfortable getting in
and out of the field and set my min field length to 3000'  TO is less
of and issue than landing.

Dan Ballin
N386DM