X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 10:31:53 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com ([209.85.160.44] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.7) with ESMTPS id 6545733 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 09:33:11 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.160.44; envelope-from=ronlaughlin@gmail.com Received: by mail-pb0-f44.google.com with SMTP id xa7so3828361pbc.17 for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 06:32:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.68.170.225 with SMTP id ap1mr3059372pbc.117.1382103155315; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 06:32:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [10.0.1.6] (ip68-229-229-161.ok.ok.cox.net. [68.229.229.161]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id wd6sm4472689pab.3.2013.10.18.06.32.34 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 18 Oct 2013 06:32:34 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Hot TITs on X country leg. LIVP References: From: Ron Laughlin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: iPad Mail (10B329) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Message-Id: X-Original-Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 08:32:34 -0500 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Turbos maintain constant manifold pressure even at higher altitudes so "lean= ing as you climb" is not usually necessary. Depends on turbo critical altitu= de.=20 Ron On Oct 18, 2013, at 6:53 AM, Keith Smith wrote: > Question about climbing "full rich". Would it not make sense to maintain s= ea-level EGT's through the climb, rather than truly full rich all the way up= to 17K? As you climb higher, 'full rich' is a whole lot richer than the mix= ture you had during takeoff. This is something I learned through John Deakin= 's Pelican Perch articles a few years back when I first got the Lancair. I u= sually 're-lean' every 1000ft or so during my climbs to maintain around 1320= EGT. >=20 > Keith > LNC2 N360JH