X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 07:53:59 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-6545571@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <keith.smith@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-pd0-f170.google.com ([209.85.192.170] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.7)
  with ESMTPS id 6545022 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 16:56:47 -0400
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.192.170; envelope-from=keith.smith@gmail.com
Received: by mail-pd0-f170.google.com with SMTP id x10so3429439pdj.1
        for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 13:56:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.108.3 with SMTP id hg3mr10348831pbb.91.1382043370028;
 Thu, 17 Oct 2013 13:56:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.70.48.66 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 13:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <list-6544800@logan.com>
References: <list-6544800@logan.com>
X-Original-Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 16:56:09 -0400
X-Original-Message-ID: <CAOjXdbqHuRx_ss_tEiX4Upmf_WhpKL_cBDYb57pg3OrHT8MXjA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Hot TITs on X country leg. LIVP
From: Keith Smith <keith.smith@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List <lml@lancaironline.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6d966e2284c004e8f60c14

--047d7b6d966e2284c004e8f60c14
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Question about climbing "full rich".  Would it not make sense to maintain
sea-level EGT's through the climb, rather than truly full rich all the way
up to 17K? As you climb higher, 'full rich' is a whole lot richer than the
mixture you had during takeoff. This is something I learned through John
Deakin's Pelican Perch articles a few years back when I first got the
Lancair. I usually 're-lean' every 1000ft or so during my climbs to
maintain around 1320 EGT.

Keith
LNC2 N360JH

--047d7b6d966e2284c004e8f60c14
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Question about climbing &quot;full rich&quot;. =A0Would it=
 not make sense to maintain sea-level EGT&#39;s through the climb, rather t=
han truly full rich all the way up to 17K? As you climb higher, &#39;full r=
ich&#39; is a whole lot richer than the mixture you had during takeoff. Thi=
s is something I learned through John Deakin&#39;s Pelican Perch articles a=
 few years back when I first got the Lancair. I usually &#39;re-lean&#39; e=
very 1000ft or so during my climbs to maintain around 1320 EGT.<div>
<br></div><div>Keith</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">LNC2 N360JH</div></div=
>

--047d7b6d966e2284c004e8f60c14--