X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 06:05:29 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nm9-vm1.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com ([216.109.114.192] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.5) with ESMTPS id 6395933 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 22:47:20 -0400 Received-SPF: neutral receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.109.114.192; envelope-from=browncc1@verizon.net Received: from [66.196.81.162] by nm9.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Jul 2013 02:46:46 -0000 Received: from [98.139.221.47] by tm8.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Jul 2013 02:46:46 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp104.vzn.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Jul 2013 02:46:46 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 759748.93388.bm@smtp104.vzn.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: .Ej2zyMVM1lthAy_2bok6N.gKLBR01b0anf8MSRCHaUCfpR HLuVWgOYzJqO0OPxFXmCrOc6ZKQ6uIkqMGY_.bbB_yvGnfdl9eGV7U0Hs5eF jod9Nxnd8N4FwGtnomMTt33mvBvMGn9X0Dyvfh1Yue5T93CrWTLuTgB.7ngO _cH5lXqF2DhBgnhTfsJ6PCgRyLtuIozLOzd7nPPRgytQQfuPplAdBMZXiznX PwmOB5dU6u990B1hg4UklyYqyRTa3qcRUKrdxwBpJOKBLTVQj.o3hgsovx4H 1tSTGTGJFdStlYtPc8fsOW4UdMx0GctFAcsMBNAUtloAvzGfPHIi9dXb6nmT rSihP9YYotlYyLM7ItlURvFunIZvnZiPOm9P5agJWat6cbXut.9KHm6olx7O 390Xazg9TI0EsncJiF47xUbTWrYNoNdLwDnrljU0qq8y_sJUeZy.Q6al5LDf .V_gvPo6z_HujqM7ywDdME6kdgnAdu8Dkk_oMPOO8VKE6mq_CxJ6vvbT7D8d N1yM2mVccRPI3ZrTQuX9shIVYqvU- X-Yahoo-SMTP: F49l9g6swBC0R9n8vJIbm7Tf3P8Xlmia8rHIwTlO__Ml X-Rocket-Received: from chass-imac-2.home (browncc1@72.64.105.53 with plain) by smtp104.vzn.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Jul 2013 19:46:46 -0700 PDT From: Charles Brown Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1--439269595 Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration X-Original-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 21:46:45 -0500 In-Reply-To: X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: X-Original-Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) --Apple-Mail-1--439269595 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Good info Paul. I am a little chagrined to find that, after loading = "Vibration" on my iPhone and going out to collect data, things were a = bunch smoother than I recalled. The only thing I changed was new spark = plugs. But I think it's clear that the vibration in my Legacy/IO550 is = much less than what I hear Bob and Steve describe. Kyrilian, would you care to examine vibration data from a test ride? I = have about 8 files of 15sec X 100Hz data taken with the iPhone secured = to the instrument panel and I don't know what to make of it. Charley On Jul 29, 2013, at 10:23 AM, Paul Miller wrote: One thing to keep in mind is that the prop balancing on the ground is = not as accurate as when the scimitar is loaded in flight. This comes = directly from one of the SX300 guys testing one of the Scimitars for = Hartzell on his Lyc 580. What he did was run the cables through the = heat duct and perform the balance in flight conditions. He reported = that balancing the scimitars was not easy. I had a hard time finding a = good balance on the ground on the Legacy but it was passable. I may try = the in-flight balance next time at the 2300 rpm mark. Our Legacy = scimitars are simply cut shorter than the longer bladed scimitars for = ground clearance. Second, the engine and cowl moves a lot and the clearances are very = tight in the Legacy. At 2700 RPM and low airspeed the cowl is different = shape than at cruise and the engine is in a different position relative = to the mounts that at 2300. The torque on the engine mounts is much = different at 2300 versus 2700. I found a lot of interference showed up = as the RPM came down from 2700 to 2300 and then the engine and cowling = were slightly separated so that the banging was transmitted. I believe = at other settings the engine was up against parts of the cowl and the = actual vibration was transmitted. I had the nose gear interference as = well plus the baffling hit the prop governor cable in cruise. Lots of = areas where interference fits are really tight. My point is that there = are many factors that can affect vibration with changing throttle and = RPM and it isn't just the prop/crankshaft combo that can be at issue. I = was seeing almost two inches of cowl movement between rest and flight at = certain locations. Thats a lot. Not to take anything away from the issue under discussion except to say = that, in my Legacy, vibration amplitude did change with varying RPM as a = result of mechanical interference. Paul Legacy --Apple-Mail-1--439269595 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

Kyrilian, would you care to examine = vibration data from a test ride?  I have about 8 files of 15sec X = 100Hz data taken with the iPhone secured to the instrument panel and I = don't know what to make of = it.

Charley


On = Jul 29, 2013, at 10:23 AM, Paul Miller wrote:

One thing to keep in mind is that the prop = balancing on the ground is not as accurate as when the scimitar is = loaded in flight. This comes directly from one of the SX300 guys testing = one of the Scimitars for Hartzell on his Lyc 580.   What he did was = run the cables through the heat duct and perform the balance in flight = conditions.  He reported that balancing the scimitars was not easy. =  I had a hard time finding a good balance on the ground on the = Legacy but it was passable.  I may try the in-flight balance next = time at the 2300 rpm mark.  Our Legacy scimitars are simply cut = shorter than the longer bladed scimitars for ground = clearance.

Second, the engine and cowl moves a lot = and the clearances are very tight in the Legacy.  At 2700 RPM and = low airspeed the cowl is different shape than at cruise and the engine = is in a different position relative to the mounts that at 2300. =  The torque on the engine mounts is much different at 2300 versus = 2700.  I found a lot of interference showed up as the RPM came down = from 2700 to 2300 and then the engine and cowling were slightly = separated so that the banging was transmitted.  I believe at other = settings the engine was up against parts of the cowl and the actual = vibration was transmitted.  I had the nose gear interference as = well plus the baffling hit the prop governor cable in cruise.  Lots = of areas where interference fits are really tight.  My point is = that there are many factors that can affect vibration with changing = throttle and RPM and it isn't just the prop/crankshaft combo that can be = at issue.  I was seeing almost two inches of cowl movement between = rest and flight at certain locations.   Thats a = lot.

Not to take anything away from the issue = under discussion except to say that, in my Legacy, vibration amplitude = did change with varying RPM as a result of mechanical = interference.

Paul
Legacy

= --Apple-Mail-1--439269595--