X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 12:15:02 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from oproxy14-pub.unifiedlayer.com ([67.222.51.224] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.5) with SMTP id 6356754 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 11:58:12 -0400 Received-SPF: neutral receiver=logan.com; client-ip=67.222.51.224; envelope-from=danny@n107sd.com Received: (qmail 30336 invoked by uid 0); 1 Jul 2013 14:23:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO host295.hostmonster.com) (66.147.240.95) by oproxy14.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 1 Jul 2013 14:23:08 -0000 Received: from [174.255.18.32] (port=4335 helo=[10.237.225.105]) by host295.hostmonster.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Utf0T-0004lc-EB; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 08:23:06 -0600 References: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-739CE51B-25EA-4CEC-8F52-FA04B3B1A5F1 X-Original-Message-Id: <2F9BE929-5ADE-466C-8378-182144B0E8BA@n107sd.com> X-Original-Cc: "lml@lancaironline.net" X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B329) From: Danny Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Never Wet... X-Original-Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 10:23:02 -0400 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List X-Identified-User: {3234:host295.hostmonster.com:wunderwe:n107sd.com} {sentby:smtp auth 174.255.18.32 authed with danny@n107sd.com} --Apple-Mail-739CE51B-25EA-4CEC-8F52-FA04B3B1A5F1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Add a lot of money and stir. I'll do it. Sent using my iPhone. Danny On Jul 1, 2013, at 8:01 AM, "Ronald Stevens" wrote: > I asked Matthew Collier and he thinks the stuff is not bad for the skin, h= owever I have an uncle testing it and he says it leaves a blurry film, so no= t sure how it will look. Also it says that you cannot use pressure washing, a= nd a nice fat rain, is acting the same way, right LOL > =20 > But it would be great if we would have some test results, and to see if it= actually can stop (or even partially) having a de-ice factor in it. Anybody= like to be a test rabbit lol > =20 > =3D=3D Ronald > =20 > From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Dou= glas Brunner > Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2013 12:12 PM > To: lml@lancaironline.net > Subject: [LML] Re: Never Wet... > =20 > Ron, > =20 > I would be interested in how well it holds up at 230 kts. (And at near su= personic speed on the prop) > =20 > D. Brunner > =20 > From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Ron= ald Stevens > Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 7:52 AM > To: lml@lancaironline.net > Subject: [LML] Never Wet... > =20 > Hello guys > =20 > Anybody already tried NeverWet as a method for not getting Ice on the wing= s and prop? > =20 > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DDZrjXSsfxMQ&feature=3Dplayer_embedded > =20 > =20 > -=3D- Ronald (LNC4-450 hours and counting=E2=80=A6..) --Apple-Mail-739CE51B-25EA-4CEC-8F52-FA04B3B1A5F1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Add a lot of money and stir. I'l= l do it.

Sent using my iPhone.

Danny

On Jul 1= , 2013, at 8:01 AM, "Ronald Stevens" <r= onald@sdc.com> wrote:

I asked Matthew Collier and he thinks the= stuff is not bad for the skin, however I have an uncle testing it and he sa= ys it leaves a blurry film, so not sure how it will look. Also it says that y= ou cannot use pressure washing, and a nice fat rain, is acting the same way,= right LOL

But it would be great if we would have some test results, and to see if= it actually can stop (or even partially) having a de-ice factor in it. Anyb= ody like to be a test rabbit lol

=3D=3D Ronald
<= /o:p>
From:<= /span> Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Douglas Brun= ner
Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2013 12:12 PM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [= LML] Re: Never Wet...

Ron,=
=
I wo= uld be interested in how well it holds up at 230 kts. (And at near sup= ersonic speed on the prop)

D. Brunner

From: Lancair Mailing Lis= t [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net= ] On Behalf Of Ronald Stevens
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 7= :52 AM
To: lml@lancaironl= ine.net
Subject: [LML] Never Wet...

Hello guys

<= span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-se= rif";color:#1F497D">Anybody already tried NeverWet as a method for not g= etting Ice on the wings and prop?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DDZr= jXSsfxMQ&feature=3Dplayer_embedded

-=3D- Ronald (LNC4-450 hours and count= ing=E2=80=A6..)
= --Apple-Mail-739CE51B-25EA-4CEC-8F52-FA04B3B1A5F1--