X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 11:40:42 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from fmailhost03.isp.att.net ([207.115.11.53] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.5) with ESMTP id 6356560 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 10:37:46 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=207.115.11.53; envelope-from=bbradburry@bellsouth.net Received: from desktop (adsl-98-85-148-231.mco.bellsouth.net[98.85.148.231]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc03) with SMTP id <20130701143710H0300popnqe>; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 14:37:10 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [98.85.148.231] From: "Bill Bradburry" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Never Wet... X-Original-Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 10:37:10 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <700BB5173D8744049974F08CE7D47E49@Desktop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002D_01CE7646.F1A0D240" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Ac52UsJTtFFaX2yUSL+AUoWcLaz7TAAFXBuA X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18463 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_002D_01CE7646.F1A0D240 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit If you look this stuff up on utube, you will find that it only lasts for a few minutes and if you touch the item, it doesn't work at all. This is a good item for dreamers but it is not ready for primetime. B2 _____ From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Ronald Stevens Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 8:01 AM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Re: Never Wet... I asked Matthew Collier and he thinks the stuff is not bad for the skin, however I have an uncle testing it and he says it leaves a blurry film, so not sure how it will look. Also it says that you cannot use pressure washing, and a nice fat rain, is acting the same way, right LOL But it would be great if we would have some test results, and to see if it actually can stop (or even partially) having a de-ice factor in it. Anybody like to be a test rabbit lol == Ronald From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Douglas Brunner Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2013 12:12 PM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Re: Never Wet... Ron, I would be interested in how well it holds up at 230 kts. (And at near supersonic speed on the prop) D. Brunner From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Ronald Stevens Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 7:52 AM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Never Wet... Hello guys Anybody already tried NeverWet as a method for not getting Ice on the wings and prop? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZrjXSsfxMQ &feature=player_embedded -=- Ronald (LNC4-450 hours and counting...) ------=_NextPart_000_002D_01CE7646.F1A0D240 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

If you look this stuff up on utube, = you will find that it only lasts for a few minutes and if you touch the = item, it doesn’t work at all.  This is a good item for dreamers but it is not ready = for primetime.

 

B2

 

From: = Lancair Mailing List = [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Ronald Stevens
Sent: Monday, July 01, = 2013 8:01 AM
To: = lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: Never = Wet...

 

I asked = Matthew Collier and he thinks the stuff is not bad for the skin, however I have = an uncle testing it and he says it leaves a blurry film, so not sure how it = will look. Also it says that you cannot use pressure washing, and a nice fat = rain, is acting the same way, right LOL

 <= /o:p>

But it = would be great if we would have some test results, and to see if it actually can = stop (or even partially) having a de-ice factor in it. Anybody like to be a = test rabbit lol

 <= /o:p>

=3D=3D = Ronald

 <= /o:p>

From: = Lancair Mailing List = [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Douglas Brunner
Sent: Sunday, June 30, = 2013 12:12 PM
To: = lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: Never = Wet...

 

Ron,

 <= /o:p>

I would be interested in how well it holds up at 230 kts.  (And at near = supersonic speed on the prop)

 <= /o:p>

D. = Brunner

 <= /o:p>

From: = Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] = On Behalf Of Ronald Stevens
Sent: Friday, June 28, = 2013 7:52 AM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Never = Wet...

 

Hello = guys

 <= /o:p>

Anybody = already tried NeverWet as a method for not getting Ice on the wings and = prop?

 <= /o:p>

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DDZrjXSsfxMQ&feature=3Dpla= yer_embedded

 <= /o:p>

 <= /o:p>

-=3D- = Ronald (LNC4-450 hours and counting…..)

------=_NextPart_000_002D_01CE7646.F1A0D240--