X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 08:06:03 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail-gg0-f174.google.com ([209.85.161.174] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.4) with ESMTPS id 6236112 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 20:48:42 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.161.174; envelope-from=pjdmiller@gmail.com Received: by mail-gg0-f174.google.com with SMTP id k2so193127ggd.33 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 17:48:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.236.117.170 with SMTP id j30mr634658yhh.51.1367369288085; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 17:48:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from pjdms-mbp.cfl.rr.com ([68.202.59.203]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id c67sm1418258yhh.16.2013.04.30.17.48.06 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 30 Apr 2013 17:48:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Paul Miller Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_360809A2-B3B4-4534-9525-508D25EF1203" X-Original-Message-Id: <5DA5E4D8-BDEA-41E3-9FDF-C5DFB98F3140@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\)) Subject: Re: [LML] Tires X-Original-Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 20:48:05 -0400 References: X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503) --Apple-Mail=_360809A2-B3B4-4534-9525-508D25EF1203 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii You are going to have troubles with that monster retread. I can send = pix if you don't believe it. On 2013-04-30, at 7:57 PM, "Bill Bradburry" = wrote: > I ordered a couple of 500-5 monster retreads from Desser. They are = backordered! > =20 > B2 > =20 > From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of = Paul Miller > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 2:43 PM > To: lml@lancaironline.net > Subject: [LML] Re: Tires > =20 > Both wear well, I use retreads on TBM but there's room, the legacy = will probably rub inside the well and on the main fork or at least the = bolts holding the fork to strut. You will have to stay with new to = avoid hassles despite the value from retreads. >=20 > Paul >=20 > On 2013-04-29, at 14:17, "Jon Socolof" wrote: >=20 >> Need to replace my Legacy tires. Currently using Goodyear FC III. Any = thoughts on retreads vs. new? >> =20 >> Jon --Apple-Mail=_360809A2-B3B4-4534-9525-508D25EF1203 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii You are going to have troubles with that monster retread. I can send pix if you don't believe it.

On 2013-04-30, at 7:57 PM, "Bill Bradburry" <bbradburry@bellsouth.net> wrote:

I ordered a couple of 500-5 monster retreads from Desser. They are backordered!

B2

From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Paul Miller
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 2:43 PM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: Tires

Both wear well, I use retreads on TBM but there's room, the legacy will probably rub inside the well and on the main fork or at least the bolts holding the fork to strut. You will have to stay with new to avoid hassles despite the value from retreads.

Paul

On 2013-04-29, at 14:17, "Jon Socolof" <jsocolof@ershire.com> wrote:

Need to replace my Legacy tires. Currently using Goodyear FC III. Any thoughts on retreads vs. new?

Jon

--Apple-Mail=_360809A2-B3B4-4534-9525-508D25EF1203--