X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 19:47:46 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from outbound-jr1.exchangedefender.com ([65.99.255.228] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.4) with ESMTPS id 6179185 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 19:46:54 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.99.255.228; envelope-from=cberland@systems3.net Received: from remote.systems3.net (wsip-98-172-79-178.ph.ph.cox.net [98.172.79.178]) by outbound-jr1.exchangedefender.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r33NkHOa006414 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 19:46:18 -0400 Received: from S3SBS08SERVER.Systems3.local ([fe80::6077:364b:fa39:c71b]) by S3SBS08SERVER.Systems3.local ([fe80::6077:364b:fa39:c71b%10]) with mapi; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 16:46:05 -0700 From: Craig Berland X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List X-Original-Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 16:46:04 -0700 Subject: Re: [LML] LIVP Power and Flight parameters from today's flight test. Thread-Topic: [LML] LIVP Power and Flight parameters from today's flight test. Thread-Index: Ac4wxWdNfhDjvxtERtWnE+07gzR6BQ== X-Original-Message-ID: <48861A69-EECB-4F5B-A192-028520E84E59@systems3.net> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ExchangeDefender-Info: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ExchangeDefender-VirusScan: Found to be clean X-ExchangeDefender-From: cberland@systems3.net X-ExchangeDefender-MagicKey: 1366242379.52228@ZKZl9Uda0NnvQ6udnCcNCg X-Spam-Status: No I pickup about 8 kts when running ROP. I pickup about 3 kts per thousand fe= et increase in altitude. The "air" can change the TAS 10-15 kts pretty easy= , so getting good test data is difficult. I ran some tests back to back ROP= and then LOP at a variety of altitudes. 8 kts is a decent rule of thumb. Craig=20 Sent from my iPad On Apr 3, 2013, at 8:24 AM, "Colyn Case" wrote: > Craig, >=20 > just noodling about my de-ice again. trying to figure out how slow I'm g= oing to be. > I only have ROP numbers on my plane at fl250. Trying to convert those in= to LOP speed. > Do you have ROP numbers for your plane up there? In other words do you k= now your ROP to LOP speed penalty? >=20 > Colyn >=20 > On Jul 24, 2012, at 7:57 AM, Craig Berland wrote: >=20 > Flight to OSH from Sedona, AZ...actually to Yankton, ND for lunch and fue= l. > Sunday > ISA +35 > FL 250 > MP 31.9 > RPM 2500 > FF 17.1 gph > TAS 277 (Chelton) >=20 > Craig Berland > N7VG >=20 > Sent from my iPad >=20 > On Jul 23, 2012, at 7:31 AM, "jeffrey liegner" wrote: >=20 >> Power and Flight parameters from today's flight test. >>=20 >> Level FL240 west bound: 15*F (IAS+41F) >>=20 >> MAP 31.5=20=20=20=20 >> RPM 2400 >> Fuel 17.1 gph (LOP) FP 30 >> TAS 257 >> LIAS 174 >> High CHT 394 (#2, of course) >> Cabin Altitude 10,000' (PSID 5.0) >>=20 >> If Fuel 18.1 gph, speed increases TAS 264 but CHT increase. >>=20 >> http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N334P >>=20 >> Comments? Analysis? >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > -- > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.ht= ml >=20 >=20 > -- > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.ht= ml