X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 09:37:15 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from planemakers.com ([206.130.122.200] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.4) with ESMTPS id 6173709 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 08:22:16 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.130.122.200; envelope-from=planemakers@planemakers.com Received: from [192.168.1.47] (pool-71-101-116-148.tampfl.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.101.116.148]) (authenticated bits=0) by planemakers.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r31CLcqw007731; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 06:21:39 -0600 X-Original-Message-ID: <51597BD5.4010502@planemakers.com> X-Original-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 08:21:41 -0400 From: "Planemakers, Inc." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Joseph Trepicone X-Original-CC: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: PPE sensor question References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050208040708090508040908" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050208040708090508040908 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Joe, John J here. One of the new owners of PPE. All the sensors you have in the pictures you provided are from the older version of PPAv. The ones that are built into AN bushing, the blue ones in the picture that you have two of, don't need any extra device to make them work other than the indicator. The one built into the pipe threaded tee is not something I am familiar with and might be a wearily version of what we are calling the UFS-T. I'm going to guess that since it is has it, it probably needs it. Maybe some of the early electronics wouldn't fit in the tee so they made an external device. I believe it should work as planed. For more information or replacement sensors, have a look at: http://www.pillarpointelectronics.com I hope this helps, John J On 3/29/2013 10:00 AM, Joseph Trepicone wrote: > Hi group, I noticed I'm using two different types of PPE sensors for two different purposes on my IV Fuel system. > > One is the type that Terrance has Posted. I've included pictures of both types. I noticed that one has an additional connector and some type of electrical device connected to it. The other does not. > > My question is: Am I missing that electrical device on my other connector? I Thought both of the sensors utilize the same prism with the difference being the type of housing. I'm wondering why one would have this and the other (blue one) would not. Any ideas? Thanks Joe Trepicone > > > > > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone --------------050208040708090508040908 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Joe,

John J here. One of the new owners of PPE.

All the sensors you have in the pictures you provided are from the older version of PPAv. The ones that are built into AN bushing, the blue ones in the picture that you have two of, don't need any extra device to make them work other than the indicator. The one built into the pipe threaded tee is not something I am familiar with and might be a wearily version of what we are calling the UFS-T. I'm going to guess that since it is has it, it probably needs it. Maybe some of the early electronics wouldn't fit in the tee so they made an external device. I believe it should work as planed.

For more information or replacement sensors, have a look at:

http://www.pillarpointelectronics.com

I hope this helps,

John J

On 3/29/2013 10:00 AM, Joseph Trepicone wrote:

Hi group, I noticed I'm using two different types of PPE sensors for two different purposes on my IV Fuel system. 

One is the type that Terrance has Posted.  I've included pictures of both types.  I noticed that one has an additional connector and some type of electrical device connected to it.  The other does not. 

My question is:  Am I missing that electrical device on my other connector?  I Thought both of the sensors utilize the same prism with the difference being the type of housing.  I'm wondering why one would have this and the other (blue one) would not. Any ideas? Thanks Joe Trepicone



Sent from my iPhone

--------------050208040708090508040908--