Bill, et al,
Relays should have a diode reverse connected across the coil to stop the
voltage surge generated by the field collapse when power is removed from
the coil. This will help protect the pressure switch contacts.
Grayhawk
Would there be any drawback to using a higher- rated contactor? I
found the Lancair part to be a P.O.S.- it was marked continuous duty but when
put on a power supply it rapidly overheated and shorted to the case.
Instead I’m using an antique 50A Leach B-5B aircraft style that easily
operated for hours. The pump supplied with my IV-P draws a maximum of 50A, so
the Leach might be marginal but I think I’ll try it initially.
On Colin’s recommendation I also purchased a TYCO LEV100A5ANH , rated
100A that I could use instead, or elsewhere. The Leach draws 0.16A, the TYCO
draws 0.25A at 28V. The Lancair- supplied Suco pressure switch is rated for 4A
as best I can determine so either unit should be compatible.
I don’t know what other models might use but consider the contacts
inside the pressure switches. If they should get overloaded and weld closed
the effect would be the same as welding the relay points. -Bill
Wade
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 9:36 AM
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam][LML] Re: Hydraulic gear pump failure -
Relays
Pardon me if I'm jumping into a discussion a little late (and a dollar
short), but there might be some confusion on how and why relays are designed
for intermittent duty. As an example, take a standard master
relay. It is rated for continuous duty and something like 80 amps.
That means the coil won't overheat if left on forever and that the contacts
also won't overheat when passing 80 amps and that the contacts won't weld when
interrupting 80 amps. It is often the limitations when opening the
circuit that determines the rating. Current will try to keep flowing and
if the contacts don't separate rapidly and with enough force the inevitable
arc could create enough heat to weld the contacts and prevent opening.
If it is desired to design a relay in the same package (for cost, size and
weight reasons) that can be used intermittently to pass a much higher current
the design parameters are different. More force is required to increase
the rate at which the contacts are opened so a higher force spring is
installed. Then more force is required to close the contacts, so fewer
turns of heavier wire are used in the coil (that's right, FEWER turns, but
that's another discussion). The result is that the relay can now
successfully switch maybe 300 amps, but the coil will overheat after a few
minutes of operation. That's the difference between a master and a
starter relay. And I have never, ever heard of using a relay as the
"weak link" in the system.
Gary
ps: My Lancair list emails now come all messed up (see
below). Why is that? Am I doing something wrong?
The
only caveat with that fix, Fred, is that intermittent relays are
ther=
e
for
a purpose. They are supposed to be the weak link in a circuit where
=
a
continuous
stuck relay could result in greater problems than a failure.=20
Does
that protective function matter in this circuit?=0D
Should
be considered.=0D
John=0D