Pardon me if I'm jumping into a discussion a little late (and a dollar
short), but there might be some confusion on how and why relays are designed for
intermittent duty. As an example, take a standard master relay. It
is rated for continuous duty and something like 80 amps. That means the
coil won't overheat if left on forever and that the contacts also won't overheat
when passing 80 amps and that the contacts won't weld when interrupting 80
amps. It is often the limitations when opening the circuit that determines
the rating. Current will try to keep flowing and if the contacts don't
separate rapidly and with enough force the inevitable arc could create enough
heat to weld the contacts and prevent opening. If it is desired to design
a relay in the same package (for cost, size and weight reasons) that can be used
intermittently to pass a much higher current the design parameters are
different. More force is required to increase the rate at which the
contacts are opened so a higher force spring is installed. Then more force
is required to close the contacts, so fewer turns of heavier wire are used in
the coil (that's right, FEWER turns, but that's another discussion). The
result is that the relay can now successfully switch maybe 300 amps, but the
coil will overheat after a few minutes of operation. That's the difference
between a master and a starter relay. And I have never, ever heard of
using a relay as the "weak link" in the system.
Gary
ps: My Lancair list emails now come all messed up (see below).
Why is that? Am I doing something wrong?
The
only caveat with that fix, Fred, is that intermittent relays are ther=
e
for
a purpose. They are supposed to be the weak link in a circuit where
=
a
continuous
stuck relay could result in greater problems than a failure.=20
Does
that protective function matter in this circuit?=0D
Should
be considered.=0D
John=0D