X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.68] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.3) with ESMTP id 6163045 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 13:22:09 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.68; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=FfdfT3uymJa5K/PDS3dxLBbEjK1E0NPJIBfq/+3UciQZcgqM488cK2BVeLJtVc/M; h=Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [71.161.209.221] (helo=[192.168.1.24]) by elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1ULGW6-0001Vz-51 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 13:21:34 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Elevator trim control From: Colyn Case In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 13:21:33 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: "Lancair Mailing List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) X-ELNK-Trace: 63d5d3452847f8b1d6dd28457998182d7e972de0d01da940e6ab3d871cb7373bc4ec38906df96f20350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 71.161.209.221 To Bob's last point, I think many Lancairs have more pitch trim = authority than you really want. Ray Allen sells some limiters that go right in the servo, but you may = also need to change the lever arm ratios to really reign it in. "Not very long" on my airplane was not long enough to complete an = instrument approach when I first flight tested it. On Mar 28, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Robert R Pastusek wrote: Angier wrote: My elevator trim on at pattern speeds works well but is way too = sensitive at high speed. Ray Allen makes a speed control and I'm curious = to know if any of you have tried it. Any other solutions out there? Angier, There are many ways to control the trim speed, but two simple ones are = to regulate the voltage applied to the trim motor or to "pulse" the = application of power to the motor. Have not checked for several years, = but the Ray Allen trim control I used originally was a voltage = controller. The problem with these devices is that they can control the = speed over a rather small range because at some point as the voltage is = reduced, the trim motor won't start running, depending on the starting = load and other factors. Any electronics hobbyist reference will have a = simple circuit you can build to control both the pulse timing and = duration. These are very effective in controlling trim "speed" over a = rather large range, but electric motors don't like to start/stop = rapidly, so this type circuit is rather more taxing on the trim motor. = On balance, I'd recommend the latter if you really want one to do = this... Now for the bottom line: I configured the pitch trim circuit in my IV-P to run at normal speed = with the flaps in any position other than full up, and to switch to low = speed when the flaps were fully retracted. I used a Ray Allen speed = control in the slow side of the circuit. It was effective in slowing the = trim to a point, but during flight test tweaking, I reduced the voltage = too much and the trim would not function in the "default" flight = configuration (flaps full up) mode, so I disabled it. I then built a = pulsing circuit to replace the voltage controller. As I was still in = flight test at the time, and much more interested in flying than = building, I finished flight testing before I had the pulse circuit ready = to install. ...so it was off to Oshkosh with my new bird (2008) and so = on... Although the pulse circuit worked exactly as designed on the bench, I = thought I needed to also add a good "bypass" capability. This was = getting complex... And by that time (50+ hours), I'd gotten used to the = pitch trim sensitivity. In the end, I elected not to install it. I've = been flying for 900+ hours/almost six years now and have never had a = problem with the trim system. I do have to remember to caution folks to = "blip" the pitch trim when I let them fly, but other than the occasional = pitch excursion when they try trimming for the first time, I've had no = problems. The fast response is particularly useful during configuration = changes and I wouldn't change that at all, so the "light touch" on the = switch seems a small price to pay for a simple and reliable system. The only other consideration I've had is for run-away trim. I've never = had this; the more likely fault is to the trim inoperative mode, but = I've heard of these failure modes. I installed a toggle switch on my = panel that switches trim control from the left to the right side stick, = with a "center/off" position. This removes power from all trim circuits = in an emergency. I've never tested whether or not I could recognize a = run-away trim problem and get it turned off before the pitch went to = full down or full up... I did test my airplane to be sure I could = control it with pitch full up and also full down during flight test, and = I strongly recommend you do this. It's an interesting experience, and if = your airplane is like mine, you wouldn't be able to fly it very long in = that condition...but it is controllable... Hope this helps. Bob -- For archives and unsub = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html