X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:11:13 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.69] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.2) with ESMTP id 6138428 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 14:02:27 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.69; envelope-from=panelmaker@earthlink.net DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=VRcEc8v3H9YDXIEq8kIBw26JFQN2Kq6DqJQN0AIFMbcxihujdh5XjMHYPCJrwbJ/; h=Received:From:To:References:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:Thread-Index:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [209.173.71.64] (helo=COMPUTER1) by elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1UJpEu-0006Mb-O0 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 14:01:52 -0400 From: "Jim Nordin" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" References: Subject: Picture sizes and other nonsense X-Original-Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 13:01:55 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <8C9FF78D711249E2B0BB3D03F5FBBE36@COMPUTER1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0032_01CE288F.C33E56C0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: Ac4osbC/p/JMMzfjSgu7BFswzNYsrgAB1ovg X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-ELNK-Trace: bdfc62829fd2a80cc8ad50643b1069f8239a348a220c2609814896b056ecd98826f18732b625559b2601a10902912494350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 209.173.71.64 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0032_01CE288F.C33E56C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I don't know but suspect there are expenses and nobody (nearly) provides resources to Marv to offset those. All the functionality is from Marv's work and there're likely to be expenses (tools et al) in that too. If Marv has outside work done, well I wouldn't expect it to be gratis. Is it a matter of money? And other things. Jim _____ From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Paul Miller Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2013 12:04 PM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Picture sizes and other nonsense Without getting people riled, could someone please explain to me why in 2013 we have a kb restriction on pictures and other teaching tools? For example, I just moved providers for three domains, I have unlimited bandwidth, unlimited storage, unlimited emails for $3/month for three years. Cost is obviously not the issue. What is it that prevents us from being more like the Beech owners site, for example? Picture included? Easy to navigate and search, lots of pictures. The best is being able to coordinate the topics into areas that are meaningful for owners. To identify planes with owners. To sell and provide services for owners. They also send me a weekly sheet of recent topics so I can browse on Sunday morning. I'm just asking because I can't be the only one in the dark. Paul, Spruce Creek Legacy (staying under the limit attachment) ------=_NextPart_000_0032_01CE288F.C33E56C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I don’t know but suspect there = are expenses and nobody (nearly) provides resources to Marv to offset those. = All the functionality is from Marv’s work and there’re likely to = be expenses (tools et al) in that too. If Marv has outside work done, well = I wouldn’t expect it to be gratis.

Is it a matter of money? And other = things.

Jim

From: = Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Paul Miller
Sent: Sunday, March 24, = 2013 12:04 PM
To: = lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Picture = sizes and other nonsense

Without getting people riled, could someone please explain to me = why in 2013 we have a kb restriction on pictures and other teaching tools? = For example, I just moved providers for three domains, I have unlimited = bandwidth, unlimited storage, unlimited emails for $3/month for three years. = Cost is obviously not the issue. What is it that prevents us from being = more like the Beech owners site, for example? Picture included? = Easy to navigate and search, lots of pictures. The best is being able to = coordinate the topics into areas that are meaningful for owners. To identify = planes with owners. To sell and provide services for owners. They = also send me a weekly sheet of recent topics so I can browse on Sunday = morning. I'm just asking because I can't be the only one in the = dark.

Paul, Spruce Creek

Legacy (staying under the limit attachment)

------=_NextPart_000_0032_01CE288F.C33E56C0--