X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 12:33:58 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from qmta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.24] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.2) with ESMTP id 6123956 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 16 Mar 2013 08:18:17 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=76.96.62.24; envelope-from=jmorgan1023@comcast.net Received: from omta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.44]) by qmta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id CBx61l0050xGWP851CHkmM; Sat, 16 Mar 2013 12:17:44 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.105] ([24.11.157.196]) by omta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id CCHj1l00x4EXR5U3YCHkku; Sat, 16 Mar 2013 12:17:44 +0000 From: Jack Morgan Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_21A48847-9B09-4E62-8ABE-9162E97C3606" Subject: Dukes pressurization port X-Original-Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 08:17:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: X-Original-Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) --Apple-Mail=_21A48847-9B09-4E62-8ABE-9162E97C3606 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Hi Ron, Dukes recommends that the port be capped off if no vacuum is available. = The cap is just to keep the innards clean so it needs to be secure but = doesn't matter if it has a slight leak. Dukes assured me that manually closing the valve with a suitable "u" = shaped wedge would not damage the unit for ground testing. Jack Morgan On Mar 16, 2013, at 6:00 AM, Lancair Mailing List wrote: > From: Ron Galbraith > Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Pressurization > Date: March 15, 2013 12:35:15 PM EDT > To: lml@lancaironline.net >=20 >=20 > Another question regarding the vacuum port on the outflow valve. If = there is no pump on it, does the port need to be capped off or open? =20 > Working on a new IVP that won't pressurize. =20 >=20 > Ron >=20 > Sent from my iPhone --Apple-Mail=_21A48847-9B09-4E62-8ABE-9162E97C3606 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Hi = Ron,

Dukes recommends that the port be capped off if = no vacuum is available. The cap is just to keep the innards clean so it = needs to be secure but doesn't matter if it has a slight = leak.

Dukes assured me that manually closing = the valve with a suitable "u" shaped wedge would not damage the unit for = ground testing.

Jack = Morgan

On Mar 16, 2013, at 6:00 AM, Lancair = Mailing List wrote: