X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:58:51 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nm11.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([66.94.237.212] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.1) with ESMTPS id 6072185 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:00:18 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.94.237.212; envelope-from=egraylaw@swbell.net Received: from [66.94.237.195] by nm11.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Feb 2013 17:59:44 -0000 Received: from [98.139.221.53] by tm6.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Feb 2013 17:59:44 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp106.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Feb 2013 17:59:44 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 770869.72690.bm@smtp106.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: lNIpf9sVM1nXXLkTSmiFFjGUnHym1yGRLWng_NAPR1AOOdj 9JhBT0rYDmgRNXRQV9Lv_7OoFSZsDad3g.mtxC9uR6dU4_IXMoG1uphfBmdy KW8wb.MY6TNORcgtdk6yUd8ZC3qVgad2K9ap1AExQ1X8oHkpdtlul2dPDV.s redbAtokazOb2Z9FpsYONTV6u2lIOLX8gWBFZ3QD9j.VOUG_cr.SFVIZ.D.F ilRBqgoa3Qtxn4G3d_czQOM6pVYVxrIn_HSvYnIsayChSYFomd7xdidpddl7 EuDBDflOxNmtgdSipSMJwXUeTNv6lRL1B3Q42leFfstNKBDnJcdPRy7I7Trw L_2Rjs3ErMwf42UsKKQ5FWxcdxZ4VUjkzYwJFjRmyLu167Fn87tC3.zpjNSI fMPMsUHL8MI6RvQs3vCxFCWSxasImkYVeGdcPanUJGd9gBNHdJ.3K1dB257j q0zL05jhDFI6f9_hfWWEGWQeRycUd X-Yahoo-SMTP: 7MzGrViswBB3AheNxBPptcOw9pGuT47xSdXn7qNf1as- Received: from GerryGrayHP (egraylaw@99.98.246.182 with login) by smtp106.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 19 Feb 2013 09:59:44 -0800 PST Reply-To: From: "Ed Gray" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: which 360 X-Original-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:59:34 -0600 X-Original-Message-ID: <009101ce0eca$e0c3e400$a24bac00$@swbell.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0092_01CE0E98.96297400" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: Ac4OyaeK15jebZftTWqvdVdtF0AUwQ== Content-Language: en-us This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0092_01CE0E98.96297400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jim, I have the Superior XP 360 B1A2 engine in my recently completed 360 mk II. It has a forward facing Precision Injector servo which gets ram air from the lower scoop, or filtered air from a butterfly valve. I have the 8.5 pistons which results in 180 horses but takes mogas. It can be ordered with 9.5 or 10.0 pistons. The current XP 360 have roller lifters and many improvements over the Lycoming engines, and they are much less $. Engine runs perfect, uses no oil. Speeds are 200mph low and 220 at 10k, at 8gph. Why spend the extra money for Lycoming, when you don't need certified engine? ------=_NextPart_000_0092_01CE0E98.96297400 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Jim, I have the Superior XP 360 B1A2 engine = in my recently completed 360 mk II. It has a forward facing = Precision Injector servo which gets ram air from the lower scoop, or = filtered air from a butterfly valve. I have the 8.5 pistons = which results in 180 horses but takes mogas. It can be ordered = with 9.5 or 10.0 pistons. The current XP 360 have roller lifters = and many improvements over the Lycoming engines, and they are much less = $. Engine runs perfect, uses no oil. Speeds are 200mph low = and 220 at 10k, at 8gph. Why spend the extra money for Lycoming, = when you don’t need certified = engine?

------=_NextPart_000_0092_01CE0E98.96297400--