X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:00:17 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.63] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.1) with ESMTP id 6069733 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:00:18 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.63; envelope-from=panelmaker@earthlink.net DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=kLJeqGhywx4XNXtKXuZY/vXkftjSLqrqoKqafiuJYLM0M2vRigBORzQ9OaMZjZN1; h=Received:From:To:References:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:Thread-index:X-MIMEOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [209.173.71.64] (helo=COMPUTER1) by elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1U7SBy-000562-7X for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:59:42 -0500 From: "Jim Nordin" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" References: Subject: Which 360? X-Original-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 08:59:41 -0600 X-Original-Message-ID: <08E02BEE2FF744409B8C9930840933F4@COMPUTER1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0044_01CE0DB6.4A795E40" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: Thread-index: Ac4MveuEv9lIm2AeRvKcgTcriA3BoABKm6yw X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-ELNK-Trace: bdfc62829fd2a80cc8ad50643b1069f8239a348a220c2609247532f595c0bd17a795bf5d57e1497b387f7b89c61deb1d350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 209.173.71.64 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0044_01CE0DB6.4A795E40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Well, I got no responders on my first note. I had hoped to have ideas from all the 360 drivers that told me what they did, what they'd do differently and the pitfalls/benefits of their installation. Any one out there that would like to comment? Jim _____ From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Jim Nordin Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2013 9:21 PM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] The best? I have an opinion and I'm sure you have one too. What is the best dash number for the Lycoming IO-360 - 180hp for the LNC2. Don't care which mount. Vans has the IO360-M1B and Glasair has the IO360-B1E. Both have different configurations obviously. The B1B is recommended by Lancair, and apparently has a forward facing throttle body, but who sells those? And is a rear facing throttle body the suitable setup? Jim ------=_NextPart_000_0044_01CE0DB6.4A795E40 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Well, I got no responders on my first note. I had hoped to have = ideas from all the 360 drivers that told me what they did, what they’d = do differently and the pitfalls/benefits of their installation.
Any one out there that would like to comment?
Jim

From: = Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Jim Nordin
Sent: Saturday, February = 16, 2013 9:21 PM
To: = lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] The = best?

I have an opinion and I’m sure you have one = too.

What is the best dash number for the Lycoming IO-360 – = 180hp for the LNC2. Don’t care which mount.

Vans has the IO360-M1B and Glasair has the IO360-B1E. Both have = different configurations obviously. The B1B is recommended by Lancair, and apparently has a forward facing throttle body, but who sells those? And = is a rear facing throttle body the suitable setup?

Jim

------=_NextPart_000_0044_01CE0DB6.4A795E40--