Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #63123
From: Randylsnarr <randylsnarr@yahoo.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Piston oil cooling jets
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 23:54:35 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Tom, 
That sounds close on the Lower baffling gaps. I doubt the inlet size is the issue. Where is your oil cooler?
Randy

Sent from my iPad

On Oct 8, 2012, at 12:44 PM, N20087 <n20087@yahoo.com> wrote:

Randy 

Thanks for the input.  I had already gotten real busy with the rtv.  I have not fixed the door to the doghouse but I think I will open the inlets a little.  I have dropped the idea of tearing into the crankcase.  I do need to go over the lower baffles once more, the gaps are not consistent and I probably have too much of the barrel exposed.  I understand lycoming suggest 2.125 inches on the head and 1.5 on the cylinder.  Is that about where you are at?

Thanks

Tom

Sent from my iPad

On Oct 8, 2012, at 1:44 PM, Randylsnarr <randylsnarr@yahoo.com> wrote:

Tom,
Pay close attention to the air inlets and transition. You will want that smooth. I have also seen large oil coolers mounted directly to the back of the baffling excessively dump the pressure on the top of the engine which you need to get effective cooling. Anything you can do to seal up the top of the engine will reduce drag and cool better. You will want the baffling sealed up tight tight tight. Put a shop light under the engine in a dark hangar and seal EVERYTHING with high temp RTV so the only place for your cooling air to go is through the cooling fins. Check the spacing on the baffling that wraps around the cylinders at the bottom. Those can be too tight as well. I would also radius them off instead of 90 degree bends where they are safety wired together too.  Also, the suggestion about closing the nose gear slot with a door is a good one and I am planning to do this as well. There is lots of air going in there especially at high angles of attack creating pressure in the lower cowl. This is bad and and it slows you down too.
Lastly, I love my plennum. If they are done right, you will go fast and run cool. 365 degrees are the norm for me in cruise.

Most of this has come from my research and looking carefully at what other guys have done . 
There may not be a magic bullet here. You may have several factors contributing to bad cooling. 
You should be able to get cool without having to resort to expensive engine mods...

Look at set ups that are working and keep after it...
Good luck..

Randy Snarr
N694RS
235/320
Sent from my iPad

On Oct 7, 2012, at 4:15 PM, steve <n5276j@aol.com> wrote:

Tom,
 
I have a 360 straight valve with 10:1 pistons,fuel injected with a slightly bigger oil cooler then normal. I increased my inlet air to four inches and a stock RV baffling system sealed tight.My exit air is 3"x 17. If not careful (too lean) on hot days I can go over 400 on takeoff/climb out on a hot day. However if I level off/ reduce power/rpm  I can stop the CHTS from going over 400, Once  cooled down (stabilized) from the takeoff I can resume full power/climb and manage the temps just fine. I never run my engine over 400 chts.
 
 I recently ran a race in Pogosa Springs Co. it was 150 miles. I ran wide open and 2650rpms, I controlled the chts with fuel and never went over 390. The oil peaked at 210, I averaged 254 mph. I do not have ney nossils nor a Plenum just a tight stock RV baffling system. I expect lower CHTS once I build a nose gear door for the bottom cowl opening that has to be upsetting the exit air from the strut opening. I also see a plenum in the future as I clean-up cooling drag that might allow me to close down inlet and exit air. But for now My cooling is fine
 
Lycon warns not to go over 400 for break-in. Doing so puts you at great risk of glazing the cylinders and annealing the rings, which will cause blow-by, burning oil. Thus causing the cylinders to run hotter. This is what I would suspect is your results.
 
Splitting the case and installing Ney nossils is not the answer in my opion. If your baffling system is correctly done with 4" inlets and adequate exit air you should not have a problem, just control the heat on climb out,if you install ney nossils it may help but its the wrong band-aid at a high price.
 
It sounds to me that you will need to re-ring and hone the cylinders and try the break-in again. Fall is here and cooler outside temps will aid in the break-in just remember do not go over 400 on the break-in.
 
 
 
steve alderman   25SA   360



 
-----Original Message-----
From: N20087 <n20087@yahoo.com>
To: lml <lml@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Sun, Oct 7, 2012 10:34 am
Subject: [LML] Piston oil cooling jets

> Folks

This is addressed to the hard core engine experts on the forum.  I would love 
your feedback on this 

I am considering having my io360 crankcase modified so that I can install piston 
cooling jets which are standard in 200hp engines.  The reason being, I have had 
to take aircraft out of service twice, once at 80 hrs and now at 160 due to 
lousy break-in and high CHTs. I have done all the obvious stuff such as plenum, 
timing, plugs, flowed the fuel servo to the rich side, baffles etc.. I am 
running 9:1 eci cerminil cylinders and they will hit 430 on climb out.  They 
went to 450 twice in the initial break-in. They will run 370 in 75% cruise and 
340 lop

All this aside, the pistons at 80 hrs (both times) were coated in dark varnish 
under the crown and the top of the crowns were heavily carbonized from oil 
blowback

I am just getting tired of it and don't want to pul the engine apart again 
anytime soon after this downturn

So,,,I am wondering if anybody has any experience or data concerning the cooling 
benefits of the piston oil nozzles.  Ie is it 5 degrees or 20+

Also, I am debating whether to split the crankcase myself or take the closed 
case (jugs and every accessory removed) with con rods still attached to the 
local shop and have them split the case, do the machining and reassemble.  The 
shop is very very reputable but of course the cost will be higher if I get them 
to do the breakdown and reassembly 

As another cooling remediation measure I was thinking of opening up the cowl 
inlets to 4 inches but a little reluctant due to the increased drag and limited 
benefit.  I added an electric cowl flap by the way and achieved only a 2 degree 
CHT improvement in climb at 130 knots Go figure!

Again, any feedback on my plan here would appreciated 

Thanks in advance 

Tom 



--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster