Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 09:58:10 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-5738107@logan.com>
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.160.52; envelope-from=billhogarty@gmail.com
References: <list-5736663@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-5736663@logan.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
From: Bill Hogarty <billhogarty@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Nutating-Disk-Engine


On Aug 30, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Ted Noel <tednoel@cfl.rr.com> wrote:

> I watched the video. They claim 0.5 pounds per hp per hour. Since our pist=
on engines are typically in the 0.4-0.45 range, it's not as efficient. It ma=
kes around 2 hp per pound, so it's a lot lighter than piston engines. They a=
re also looking at Jet A fuel, so it may do somewhat better.  Instering...
>=20
> Ted Noel
> N540TF
>=20
> On 8/29/2012 3:49 PM, Greenbacks, UnLtd. wrote:
>> There are so many new ideas for engines to replace the good ole piston en=
gine, but almost none of them ever make it into production.  The ancient pis=
ton rules.  Here is another one of those new engine ideas which seem to have=
 several significant advantages over piston engines (No one usually lists th=
e disadvantages).  This one can be compression ignition, 2 to 4 times the po=
wer to weight, multifuel including JP8, more efficient, far less vibration, l=
ess complex, and can be self supercharged.  You are going to like this one.
>>=20
>>=20
>> http://www.engineeringtv.com/video/Nutating-Disk-Engine-Delivers-H
>> --
>> For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.ht=
ml
>>=20
>>=20
>=20
>=20
> --
> For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.htm=
l