X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 11:39:34 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mta31.charter.net ([216.33.127.82] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0c1) with ESMTP id 5706281 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:49:58 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.33.127.82; envelope-from=farnsworth@charter.net Received: from imp11 ([10.20.200.11]) by mta31.charter.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.02 201-2260-151-103-20110920) with ESMTP id <20120813144922.BZSL24708.mta31.charter.net@imp11> for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:49:22 -0400 Received: from karen305d6aa99 ([96.32.82.24]) by imp11 with smtp.charter.net id mEpM1j00b0XV3AQ05EpNxF; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:49:22 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=8n69asTuZbMnXn9oCQM8qmqRc2QTO8vVbX5gOB99VVA= c=1 sm=1 a=1M1o1ys9qfcA:10 a=yUnIBFQkZM0A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=iJQyNv5OtPD1cCIz+vZOPA==:17 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=QrM8PbokocH3QLktH-sA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=CVU0O5Kb7MsA:10 a=EzXvWhQp4_cA:10 a=iJQyNv5OtPD1cCIz+vZOPA==:117 From: "Lynn Farnsworth" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [LML] Question about TAS Error (and Winds Calculation) based on OAT (in a LIVP) X-Original-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:49:22 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <091301cd7962$d3b0d5f0$7b1281d0$@net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Ac15U4q1jjzSOyu1TVSmcdh/hqFfoAADR43A Content-Language: en-us Jeff, I have a Legacy so I can't say how my experience would relate to a IV. That being said, my OAT was originally installed in the right cabin air duct which is on the fuselage aft of the engine. I was looking at recorded (data from a Chelton) Reno Air information. I happened to notice that the OAT showed a marked increase from engine start to race completion. I think it was about 25 to 30 degrees. We decided most of the rise was from engine heat flowing back along the fuselage. We moved the sensor out to the right wing on a inspection panel just forward of the right main landing gear. There is still compression effect from flying at IAS of 300Kts plus though. Lynn -----Original Message----- From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of jeffrey liegner Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 9:00 AM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Question about TAS Error (and Winds Calculation) based on OAT (in a LIVP) Recently, I've been doing (and sharing with you) some engine setting tests with WOT climbs and LOP cruise settings at different RPM/MAP settings. This has been partly due to new GAMI injectors, a recent top end overhaul (400 hours), and renewed curiosity (not the Martian lander). The experiment is not over yet. My LIVP has the OAT installed at the standard location on the pilot side fuselage, near the cabin door. I have calibrated my Cheltons for the compression effect on the OAT reading at high/low speeds. But I have seen ice form at indicated OAT 36*F, and my Malibu friends have shared their POH's "Temperature Rise Due to Ram Recovery" graph. I shared this with the LML on Aug 9, 2009. And recently, someone on the LML wondered why he always sees a headwind on his EFIS. During my weekend flight from Oregon to New Jersey (duration 8 hours), I expected some decent tail winds based on forecasts. But my Chelton EFIS often showed a crosswind, sometimes a headwind, and rarely a very mild tail wind; not what was expected. This was at FL230 and FL250. So I was thinking that if my OAT was reporting an erroneous reading, then the TAS calculation provided would be wrong. Then the calculation of winds based on Magnetic Heading compared to Ground Track mixed with the GPS derived ground speed compared with my TAS would be in error. This makes the OAT a critical value to proper reporting and judging. Everything ties back to accurate OAT reading. First, what suggestions do you have regarding this OAT question? Do you have some keen examples showing an OAT error of X produces a TAS error of a certain magnitude Y? Then, based on prior experience (not installer intuition), what have you discovered regarding your OAT readings and then sensor locations in the LIVP? Maybe this is leading me to rewire the OAT, but I'm not wild about the idea of this without some solid experience by others. Thanks. Jeff L N334P Footnote: On the ground, the plane's OAT matches the measured temperature on the cars, the bank and on the radio. -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html