X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 16:30:17 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nm26.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([98.138.90.89] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.5) with SMTP id 5573655 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 16:15:26 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=98.138.90.89; envelope-from=gbfitz@swbell.net Received: from [98.138.226.179] by nm26.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Jun 2012 20:14:49 -0000 Received: from [68.142.194.244] by tm14.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Jun 2012 20:14:49 -0000 Received: from [66.94.237.103] by t2.bullet.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Jun 2012 20:14:49 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1008.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Jun 2012 20:14:49 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 546052.31946.bm@omp1008.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 84359 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2012 20:14:49 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=swbell.net; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language; b=QmVEaSrCbuTFM4VNaS7FGLFMvxQDXA3+GO4Rb7RIAODa6OigkrCuui40obbCJDiYpflE4UgCbMtGWdQFdnFX/JumNdh4K7pKeYRBQXWAF34SnxLc3Yiimnw67+diKS31ZNh0PwhNXkxh67M5jj58bpeXeS/IzwaA1mXYmEywXJU= ; X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: kEYAXHUVM1kvGSOCuu07h7p82ymXEDA1eOA.vH.2SJdo51i f2u9I7obpwnJPUoiYKgukzbh0X4miApGMEEew5pKaP4_oTtxnNyjwWfMhcOf 9yIOKqy6HcpviXQ2hTfaTnu1ZgS.URlNy4zAgq.I_QytNlcEc3P1FR_R6N86 eUudmkklW3Eg_gEPXZAIyom0vL4L25F3ULUwPSkKzVz69XegLD_cIkwz2p9o gOhwCwpijsM_yUZJH2zoSUeDTV5_uEH4vwRslQTHqr2B4Ot9nLelHojJLo9O s9IiV5qGVbrc46qthJAdVClS2J6zVYwvmWq4rvd2m13ixvr3aoOdQTa74ttg wbEm6TJZGnPwdcs5CCmsCtQno53afLU6zzR3.QOvuksgsb_V.1TTKu7sJuMO 4c2InyfoJIQiT4VG6rdF8TOtNf2at.xtYkWTXEDmC X-Yahoo-SMTP: YDcEmEeswBCQ9VCECdJgJSdIOsUDlolGAbHYYIoo Received: from MONSTERGARAGE76 (gbfitz@108.78.178.117 with login) by smtp110.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 01 Jun 2012 13:14:49 -0700 PDT From: "Gary Fitzgerald" X-Original-To: Subject: [LML] Hydraulic vs. electric CS props X-Original-Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 15:14:44 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <003001cd4033$303e4730$90bad590$@net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0031_01CD4009.47683F30" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Ac1AMy9z5Yk+rOaeQ8yJeNiwvNRS6w== Content-Language: en-us This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0031_01CD4009.47683F30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Is there an advantage to using a hydraulic CS prop over an electric one? Does anybody out have experience with the MT 3-blade electric prop? Gary Fitzgerald LNC2 ~70% St. Charles, MO (Still) Looking for a good deal on a used or rebuildable (I)O-360 ------=_NextPart_000_0031_01CD4009.47683F30 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Is there = an advantage to using a hydraulic CS prop over an electric one? = Does anybody out have experience with the MT 3-blade electric = prop?

Gary Fitzgerald

LNC2 ~70%

St. = Charles, MO

(Still) Looking for a = good deal on

a used or rebuildable = (I)O-360

------=_NextPart_000_0031_01CD4009.47683F30--