X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 13:28:57 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nm20-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com ([98.139.91.218] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.4) with SMTP id 5466839 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 11:07:06 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=98.139.91.218; envelope-from=bu131@swbell.net Received: from [98.139.91.66] by nm20.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Apr 2012 15:06:31 -0000 Received: from [98.139.44.65] by tm6.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Apr 2012 15:06:31 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1002.access.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Apr 2012 15:06:31 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 822062.80562.bm@omp1002.access.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 12182 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Apr 2012 15:06:31 -0000 DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=swbell.net; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=1zJZn+e+oVDju0EkaQaWyzXj8yTSUKxCnM1XcpitmKwgVgkaUZJaTAYnL7GerTWMfL7lpLO1yWHtJi+0KbOki1wi+8eUea0wXIlE4vhaup5miZGWbi7G+fH/RbuLmMZfYUQEbre0CeNiNABHY3iLAZVHvGJmqCyn071uGbpmGcM=; X-YMail-OSG: HQPy814VM1nnBfbu5QdpaU3uVcnwSmkuGO.TSis7szZ7BCf A3J6DZwGuDsvtOhTJO176JKy66nYEeXu7De0638beGssEC.nmRfvMt6I62CT fjjFEpZXBaTlwyA.TLxlBcMdngiIl3tJ9AU6se4FSboNGX4Req2Do_qeHVPv hCOGoofd0o428M0BO3bMMKTN7asDvslQqm7g0jTBFboHPHX_g5TgUIAD7RE8 aKZrn0HNBdxJwPl1iBCZdpbwxBcIL_38D_81oq39qvAu3r2f1VaSCCvCk1JZ 7rYzxYUo_0FVmFChoiim7qtRrVJdimMXMZLY7ifO9ipzRD_UvsUs1gQPjpzS tIhzQA54J80AFIXKJcTefYAUU8xh03xIb3tozZu09pUH6J.FcCRSPD1W3e9F 0Gx88Y8Cxxu.7HIa871iQSOR5EZeDYJZKzcyvB1EEyb43F5qLCrwCwlX5kKo gesyyQ5skkjBobD1nF_liZeaKtpFLhW0N4cFStfUZJQg4qarjXrO2 Received: from [99.181.53.104] by web80016.mail.sp1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 08:06:31 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.117.340979 References: X-Original-Message-ID: <1333465591.90850.YahooMailNeo@web80016.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> X-Original-Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 08:06:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Dr Andres Katz Reply-To: Dr Andres Katz Subject: Re: [LML] Re: engine movement X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-167911949-807997241-1333465591=:90850" ---167911949-807997241-1333465591=:90850 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable a good idea is to prop the engine mount by placing 2 large thick washers in= the top of the mounts. Gravity will make the engine sag with time and as i= t does you can easily remove the washers and reestablish a straight line. S= o arrange the lines with the option of being able to raise the entire mount= up in 6-8 months by just removing the washers. Sag is ever-present.=0A=0Aa= k=0A=0A=0A________________________________=0A From: Charles Brown =0ATo: lml@lancaironline.net =0ASent: Tuesday, April 3, 2012 9= :21 AM=0ASubject: [LML] Re: engine movement=0A =0APaul, great shot, thanks.= =A0 My engine, at 110 hr total time, is now (at rest) flush with the cowl; = it started out 1/4" high so has sagged 1/4 inch in 6mo/110 hours.=A0 Also, = it's now Bug Season in Texas and I have observed bugs on the upper cowl beh= ind the spinner to a depth of about 3/8" (and none on the lower cowl).=A0 S= o I conclude that flight loads pull my spinner down about 3/8".=A0 The moun= ts are standard-issue, whatever that is (I got the firewall forward fast bu= ild) -- look like basic big ol Lord mounts.=A0 But I'm going to shim them a= nd try to de-sag things.=0A=0A=0AOn Apr 2, 2012, at 1:59 PM, Paul Miller wr= ote:=0A=0AThis photo demonstrates how much the engine pulls down (and also = to the left) relative to the cowl during normal operation in the Legacy.=A0= This was from a photo shoot at normal power.=A0 At rest, the spinner is f= lush with the cowl so I estimate at least an inch drop.=A0 This corresponds= to what I'm finding with interference on the lower cowl but it is at least= an inch away when I remove the cowl for inspection.=A0 My plan is to shim= up the mount at the front two isolators.=A0 These are relatively new Berry= mounts, no shims installed. All of the hard hits I previously had on the u= pper cowl are now removed.=A0 I use a white primer between flights inside t= he upper cowl to provide witness marks and the most recent flights have sho= wn no interference.=A0 However, I still get interference during flight at = cruise RPMs that I am starting to identify on the lower cowl.=A0 Hopefully,= those are the last.=A0 Tight cowling + twisting engines =3D lot of work.= =0A=0APaul=0ALegacy RG Spruce Creek=0A=0A<_BJV1340c.jpeg>--=0AFor archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/Li= st.html=0A=0A=0A--=0AFor archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:8= 1/lists/lml/List.html ---167911949-807997241-1333465591=:90850 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
a good i= dea is to prop the engine mount by placing 2 large thick washers in the top= of the mounts. Gravity will make the engine sag with time and as it does y= ou can easily remove the washers and reestablish a straight line. So arrang= e the lines with the option of being able to raise the entire mount up in 6= -8 months by just removing the washers. Sag is ever-present.

ak


From: Charles Brown <browncc1@verizon.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2012 9:21 AM
Subject: [LML] Re: engine movement

=0APaul, great shot, thanks.  My engine, at 110 = hr total time, is now (at rest) flush with the cowl; it started out 1/4" hi= gh so has sagged 1/4 inch in 6mo/110 hours.  Also, it's now Bug Season= in Texas and I have observed bugs on the upper cowl behind the spinner to = a depth of about 3/8" (and none on the lower cowl).  So I conclude tha= t flight loads pull my spinner down about 3/8".  The mounts are standa= rd-issue, whatever that is (I got the firewall forward fast build) -- look = like basic big ol Lord mounts.  But I'm going to shim them and try to = de-sag things.


On Apr 2, 2012, at 1:59 PM, Paul Miller wrote:
This photo demonstrates how much the engine pulls down (and also to th= e left) relative to the cowl during normal operation in the Legacy.  T= his was from a photo shoot at normal power.  At rest, the spinner is = flush with the cowl so I estimate at least an inch drop.  This corresp= onds to what I'm finding with interference on the lower cowl but it is at least an inch awa= y when I remove the cowl for inspection.  My plan is to shim up the m= ount at the front two isolators.  These are relatively new Berry mount= s, no shims installed. All of the hard hits I previously had on the upper c= owl are now removed.  I use a white primer between flights inside the = upper cowl to provide witness marks and the most recent flights have shown = no interference.  However, I still get interference during flight at = cruise RPMs that I am starting to identify on the lower cowl.  Hopeful= ly, those are the last.  Tight cowling + twisting engines =3D lot of = work.

Paul
Legacy RG Spruce Creek

<_BJV1340c.jpeg>&l= t;spinnder_drop.jpeg>--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironl= ine.net:81/lists/lml/List.html


--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html=


---167911949-807997241-1333465591=:90850--