Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:25:56 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-5452543@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.66; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net;
  b=QqPGgdRso6oFiIq9Q1vkak3NSa8daWUcrbFleVDUOIJAgvgwTenVqXj/iaHixjsd;
  h=Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Rain, primer, and paint
From: Colyn Case <colyncase@earthlink.net>
In-Reply-To: <list-5451261@logan.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
References: <list-5451261@logan.com>

Not so.    If you paint glass with anti-static paint, the charge can =
move to where the wicks are and then overboard.

On Mar 21, 2012, at 2:21 PM, Lorn H Olsen wrote:

Tom,

None of us other 320/360 drivers have static wicks. Nor do we have =
problems that static wicks would resolve. Also don't forget that because =
our planes are fiberglass, they are not conductive and therefore, =
without much effort, the static wicks would be useless.

Lorn

> From: N20087 <n20087@yahoo.com>
> Date: March 20, 2012 3:56:29 PM EDT
>=20
> Folks,
>=20
> Can anyone suggest a static wick solution for the 360.  How can wicks =
be grounded (or should they?) on a non carbon airframe?
>=20
> Thanks
> Tom

--
Lorn H. 'Feathers' Olsen, MAA, ASMEL, ASES, Comm, Inst
DynaComm, Corp., 248-345-0500, mailto:lorn@dynacomm.us
LNC2, FB90/92, O-320-D1F, 1,800 hrs, N31161, Y47, SE Michigan


--
For archives and unsub =
http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html