X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 15:56:29 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nm30-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com ([98.139.213.126] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.4) with SMTP id 5449768 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 15:16:27 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=98.139.213.126; envelope-from=n20087@yahoo.com Received: from [98.139.215.140] by nm30.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Mar 2012 19:15:49 -0000 Received: from [98.139.215.250] by tm11.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Mar 2012 19:15:49 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1063.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Mar 2012 19:15:49 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 417500.18147.bm@omp1063.mail.bf1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 53585 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2012 19:15:49 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Subject:References:From:Content-Type:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version; b=xZOErvmDqMJtK2SbBdAGt4HehcKlg+vanhvcSrXquEnwZVlJSILarHy4eXSfOZCqXQlUOv0fl9q+bO2dsCNraWWvQaImn+OQ/EkpXqGZ1cLa13qYfYBMGjoL14tGQb8Azj78y8G9W/eKuw9N0Qv/APtkLJfMUJ9f2/UE9m0xojw= ; X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: ejOR_MoVM1nVDDefdETshy1FjIquL7v9QE44Cj3gNP8rbdz BxC94vetN0.0noJ_ZZYppcnuAQ7aowsoMhwfAyJxY3Z596P7GzLy2OZTO0Aj GeHm.KOQ80iNUB7i3w2WRq_fILLugI7MGNIeduYHMMMMp4z05o80OjljCSN5 zYoyvvEfsdwauJQadvwCqe_jtv6oBTwFIS1FPWeTjRJ2ovgdOphJkRjygfnu Ysut_0F_K2SZXtN4xcN_ij0pymqysuv1_.PQ2sqBHavW5Ajge293qB6wNnZq tMfSMA8fUDnuzHFqtrPTVUMRDbRN_AWkAdXXGJUKerS8Anp_0g4uruCYiuJh Ar5flzCPr02XNwzokWp1tXzkuCN370htb2AlYw4Gqg2mp2w228grlW0LuwlR MjFUY3fEfn4.rRtOCjjhm2cKDGUJMLM5YEIeJGNjVcQgX3XOIv__i X-Yahoo-SMTP: NQQt3c2swBAKSrExoA1eZuT7_w-- Received: from [192.168.1.122] (n20087@98.185.51.168 with xymcookie) by smtp113-mob.biz.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Mar 2012 12:15:49 -0700 PDT Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Rain, primer, and paint References: From: N20087 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9A334) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Message-Id: <8D9C88AB-9349-42AD-AEF6-C25CE072282F@yahoo.com> X-Original-Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 15:15:48 -0400 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Folks, Can anyone suggest a static wick solution for the 360. How can wicks be gro= unded (or should they?) on a non carbon airframe? Thanks Tom Sent from my iPad On Mar 20, 2012, at 11:23 AM, wrote: > Charley, >=20 > I got about 120 hrs on my paint now. It is an automotive base coat + > clear coat. Out of the 120 hrs there may be 10 - 15 hrs IFR with very > little exposure to ice and approx. 2 hrs in the rain. I fly between > 10.000 and 25.000 depending on the wind. Here is what I see so far. >=20 > Before I added the static wicks high/altitude high speed IFR did some > noticeable damage to the leading edges of my wings. It looks like little > stone nicks. After adding the static wicks it got a lot better but I am > not sure if it stopped completely (all static wicks are grounded well). >=20 > Rain - when I get in the rain I slow down the plane to 170 kts or so. I > am able to see some small damage at exposed edges of the plane e.g. > around air intake of the cowl, around the wind shield etc. I think it > does not hurt to fly an approach in the rain with 130kts or so. >=20 > I also got some small cracks in the paint by now. >=20 > I am here in Ohio and I also flew the plane in the winter. When I come > down from high altitude and cold air down into warm air I can see > sometimes condensation on the paint on spots where bolts are underneath > or where your fuel bays are. I can just assume that it must be hard on > the different materials with different heat expansion factors going > through these rapid temperature changes in climb and descent. >=20 > My conclusion (and others might have a different opinion): when you use > your airplane as a serious travel instrument you will be exposed to > weather at times and it will do some damage to your paint. If you do > your planning completely around your plane and your paint I am not sure > if it will look like new forever or if the vibrations and G-forces get > to it at some point of time....=20 >=20 > Ralf >=20 >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Charles Brown [mailto:browncc1@verizon.net]=20 > Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 6:18 AM > To: lml@lancaironline.net > Subject: Rain, primer, and paint >=20 > OK, the guys who already know this can sit back and chuckle, the rest of > you, here's a bulletin on flying IFR in primer. I gather that WLS > primer is not as hard as paint and about a half hour in moderate rain at > 210ktas was enough to visibly erode small areas of all the leading > edges. I think all that really happened was that defects in the > underlying layers, which had been filled by WLS, were revealed. At any > rate, there were numerous small areas (largest: 1/4" X 1/4"; most areas > smaller) where pinholes, underlying BID mesh, and occasional air bubbles > in micro were revealed. Recommendation: fly with a harder coating than > WLS or avoid rain. The WLS held up just fine in ordinary flying for 100 > hours. >=20 > I've scheduled paint as soon as I can get into the shop, in the meantime > I'm repairing the leading edges and spraying the repairs with K36 primer > which the paint shop recommended (and I can get a quart for $80 rather > than paying $300 for a gallon of WLS). Then, until painting, I'll cover > the leading edges with leading edge tape. >=20 > Question for you IFR guys with APA (Already-Painted Airplanes): What's > your experience with rain and paint? =20 >=20 > Charley Brown > Legacy #299 100 hours >=20 > -- > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.htm= l