X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:18:08 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nm8.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com ([98.139.52.205] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.4) with SMTP id 5447866 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 11:07:28 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=98.139.52.205; envelope-from=randylsnarr@yahoo.com Received: from [98.139.52.190] by nm8.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Mar 2012 15:06:53 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.172] by tm3.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Mar 2012 15:06:53 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1055.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Mar 2012 15:06:53 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 1508.84373.bm@omp1055.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 44414 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2012 15:06:22 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:References:In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Message-Id:Cc:X-Mailer:From:Subject:Date:To; b=3Qvvh0+QQF7Ch7zFhX8fRzVHny8sgubE0IWvqfno3mTpTzA+kpYTasYH/kc2FL8HwkK8rtnDd2xGvxNnYd47y4Fc+UmZfnrVmGjgBFEoIZwj6wb9WGlkqjiZWoglpvhY4OTfNcfhXjwOB12CZJJRVYWAAN4pAA9F/H+UmcE7z8Y= ; X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: 6E42TzUVM1lUJs7yyUsYkooFdWQif0HqHAqMIxDJsaVXHNM CV2iXeMYkpueS.i_Np.ueSBuAmLiJN5eAajWjSgYdISFTuB1WOUu7AeAdA0S 2UNSsta.jXie_r6qJuN7apuaT3uC5vL63_94yHy7mtLvLxpMYwlc2by67xx_ H4PFabh.ppzB7NEjmbuamzcse_vv71YbBxssxOFGoPw05fW_qwyjm8D2sJl9 8K_TLJ3XFw6kRMI2cSe8hw8A.cahOVnjlQMr.00qtDoHewr0o_fr1qbzCYvM v9iUExbaZhVXBR2Vqa3JWsgBqGVbm0..vLVr19CqsypICbHiygtNGFCgqm9e LSe6kxouz4ZWkI5uIrgWPvSRmnjGH9ycC.csPpoBNOp6PqeSEprdu3ZGEL5H 0PiaGMRBtue6Ddsn2W5RLr1he_uisfXhtks79fH.FZIjgpQ-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: tg4YEXeswBAq79ZTs5A79J5zDY9lAVNV Received: from [192.168.220.236] (randylsnarr@69.169.190.15 with xymcookie) by smtp114-mob.biz.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with SMTP; 19 Mar 2012 08:06:22 -0700 PDT References: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Original-Message-Id: X-Original-Cc: "lml@lancaironline.net" X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9A334) From: Randylsnarr Subject: Re: [LML] Re: hydraulic pressure gauges X-Original-Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:06:21 -0600 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List With all that has been said and done about the Lancair gear system, I added g= auges to my 235/320. At a cost of about $90 and a few ounces of weight. I kn= ow exactly what is happening with my gear system just like I do with the oth= er critical systems on the airplane. I would not build another Lancair witho= ut them... FWIW Randy Snarr 235 320 N694RS Sent from my iPad On Mar 19, 2012, at 4:17 AM, "Bill Wade" wro= te: > Just so, although each Lancair is built according to an individual's ideas= . In my mind switches on the gear doors are a good way to ensure the gear is= up. Years ago I patented an indicator system that among other things displa= yed gear up as well as down- nowadays I'm not so sure I'd want lights shinin= g all the time. >=20 > Complexity is subjective- there's tradeoffs involved. If you want to fly y= ou can't get much simpler than a J-3 Cub. Anything more than that adds capab= ility but also additional systems. A hydraulic gauge serves a purpose for me= but it doesn't have to be for everyone. BTW, I'd use 5052 tubing instead of= a hose- simpler, lighter, cheaper. -Bill Wade >=20 > -----Original Message----- From: John Barrett > Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 8:13 AM > To: lml@lancaironline.net > Subject: [LML] Re: hydraulic pressure gauges >=20 > Most IV's have gear indicators. Up and Down. If you don't have one or th= e > other it would mean the gear is in transit. >=20 > John Barrett >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Bil= l > Wade > Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 12:44 PM > To: lml@lancaironline.net > Subject: [LML] Re: hydraulic pressure gauges >=20 > Good point, although in the IV it appears that continuous pressure is > needed to keep the gear up. Not sure how other models are but I'd guess > they're similar. You might get some warning of low pressure from a pump or= > pressure switch malfunction if you had switches on the gear doors. Or if > speed started to decay. >=20 > Navions have an engine-driven pump with a controllable pressure/ dump > valve. I'm used to checking the gauge prior to taxi to make sure the syste= m > is up and running. It's not a bad idea to make sure there's pressure even > with over-center links and locking pins. -Bill Wade >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: jeffrey liegner > Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 8:34 AM > To: lml@lancaironline.net > Subject: [LML] Re: hydraulic pressure gauges >=20 >=20 > After reviewing the options for tapping into the hydraulics, the plumbing > and the gauge, rather than having a gauge on the panel somewhere, I'm now > actually thinking I will place a transducer off the hydraulic distribution= > manifold in the gear well. Then I would make this an annual option (or > periodic option), connecting a display gauge to read the high-low. >=20 > I'm thinking that I don't need immediate and continuous monitoring of the > pressure. If the flaps or gear transit time slows, I will know this. If > the pressure is suddenly lost (catastrophic loss of hydraulics), having th= e > gauge won't tell me more than what I already know...gear won't go down, > flaps don't work. And having another high pressure hose behind the panel > invites a new leak. >=20 > Thoughts? >=20 > Jeff L >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > On the IV-P I'm planning to tee a mechanical gauge in the Pressure line > going to the control valve assembly. That'd show me what's available for u= se >=20 > and there's no need for any external power source. >=20 > That could be in addition to transponders monitoring pressure at other > points in the system. -Bill Wade >=20 >=20 >=20 > I just finished installing 2 hydraulic gages. I was replacing all flex h= yd >=20 > lines with new, so it wasn't hard to include a T in the up line and down > line located under the passenger seat. Made an aluminum add on mini panel= > that goes between pilot's legs and straddles my flap switch. Ran 2 four > foot lines to back of gages. All works great on several gear swings, but= > no operational/environmental experience yet. >=20 > I definitely wanted the gages where I could see them for any diagnosis, an= d > the panel was full of 1000 steam gages already. >=20 > Gages are number 9780T221 from McMaster-Carr for a low $21.48 each. Thes= e > are liquid filled with silicon (-40 deg F to 158deg F). Entire operation > cost less than $100. >=20 > I'll forward a picture in day or so. >=20 > Jack Addison jraddison@msn.com > IO360 high comp >=20 >=20 >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: jeffrey liegner [mailto:liegner@ptd.net] > Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 6:56 AM > To: lml@lancaironline.net > Subject: Suggested Pressure Gauge for Hydraulic Monitoring (LIVP) >=20 > Any suggestions on which small hydraulic pressure gauge would be a good > choice to display hydraulic pressure, either during preflight (ex, in whee= l > well) or inside the cockpit (for monitoring)? Analogue or electric displa= y? > Best location to T the gauge into the system? >=20 > Thanks. >=20 > Jeff Liegner > Sparta, NJ >=20 > -- > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.htm= l >=20 >=20 >=20 > -- > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.htm= l >=20 >=20 > -- > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.htm= l=20 >=20 >=20 > -- > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.htm= l