X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:34:34 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mtaz1.mailnet.ptd.net ([204.186.29.65] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.4) with ESMTP id 5442946 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 06:41:30 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.186.29.65; envelope-from=liegner@ptd.net Received: from mb7.mailnet.ptd.net (mb7.mailnet.ptd.net [204.186.29.17]) by mtaz1.mailnet.ptd.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5388D3204BF for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 06:40:55 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 06:40:55 -0400 (EDT) From: jeffrey liegner X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [LML] Re: hydraulic pressure gauges X-Original-Message-ID: <97de2096-092f-44a5-b9d9-95c426f84adc@mb7.mailnet.ptd.net> In-Reply-To: <23c7f070-ca72-4d4c-8798-23a3ba82123d@mb7.mailnet.ptd.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [71.2.40.122] X-Mailer: Zimbra 7.1.3_GA_3346 (ZimbraWebClient - SAF3 (Mac)/7.1.3_GA_3346) After reviewing the options for tapping into the hydraulics, the plumbing a= nd the gauge, rather than having a gauge on the panel somewhere, I'm now ac= tually thinking I will place a transducer off the hydraulic distribution ma= nifold in the gear well. Then I would make this an annual option (or perio= dic option), connecting a display gauge to read the high-low. I'm thinking that I don't need immediate and continuous monitoring of the p= ressure. If the flaps or gear transit time slows, I will know this. If th= e pressure is suddenly lost (catastrophic loss of hydraulics), having the g= auge won't tell me more than what I already know...gear won't go down, flap= s don't work. And having another high pressure hose behind the panel invit= es a new leak. Thoughts? Jeff L On the IV-P I'm planning to tee a mechanical gauge in the Pressure line goi= ng to the control valve assembly. That'd show me what's available for use a= nd there's no need for any external power source. That could be in addition to transponders monitoring pressure at other poi= nts in the system. -Bill Wade I just finished installing 2 hydraulic gages. I was replacing all flex hy= d lines with new, so it wasn't hard to include a T in the up line and down = line located under the passenger seat. =A0Made an aluminum add on mini pane= l that goes between pilot's legs and straddles my flap switch. Ran 2 four= foot lines to back of gages. All works great on several gear swings, but= no operational/environmental experience yet. I definitely wanted the gages where I could see them for any diagnosis, and= the panel was full of 1000 steam gages already. Gages are number 9780T221 from McMaster-Carr for a low $21.48 each. These= are liquid filled with silicon (-40 deg F to 158deg F). =A0Entire operatio= n cost less than $100. I'll forward a picture in day or so. Jack Addison =A0jraddison@msn.com IO360 high comp -----Original Message----- From: jeffrey liegner [mailto:liegner@ptd.net] Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 6:56 AM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Suggested Pressure Gauge for Hydraulic Monitoring (LIVP) Any suggestions on which small hydraulic pressure gauge would be a good choice to display hydraulic pressure, either during preflight (ex, in wheel= well) or inside the cockpit (for monitoring)? Analogue or electric display= ? Best location to T the gauge into the system? Thanks. Jeff Liegner Sparta, NJ