X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:24:17 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from a2s34.a2hosting.com ([216.119.134.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.4) with ESMTPS id 5397301 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:16:28 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.119.134.2; envelope-from=lorn@dynacomm.us DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=dynacomm.us; h=Received:From:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Subject:Date:Message-Id:To:Mime-Version:X-Mailer:X-Source:X-Source-Args:X-Source-Dir; b=JHvHYBz4tsW6re/q/sBRcl2d//BWjAF6u0kEImNK3CI+ZHaG+QOoEup0luaz5+WirwkSqmrAABdyaaopz/v31xXTQuZtBEXIblwfRg9KE6AhAUJGvEB2v9VXsLZ7YKjO; Received: from c-68-42-83-236.hsd1.mi.comcast.net ([68.42.83.236] helo=[192.168.1.9]) by a2s34.a2hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RxRbD-004KA5-W9 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:15:52 -0500 From: Lorn H Olsen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Tempest spark plugs X-Original-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:15:51 -0500 X-Original-Message-Id: <948C4D50-DEE1-4D02-8D7A-C06CA7FD9CB6@dynacomm.us> X-Original-To: Lancair List Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1253) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1253) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - a2s34.a2hosting.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lancaironline.net X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - dynacomm.us X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: George, I have been using REM38S plugs for about 1,000 hours. My engine is an = O-320-D1F 8.5 compression, 160HP Lycoming. I run as lean as possible for = a carbed engine. As far as I know, the 38 has been the standard = recommended plug for this engine. Should I be considering cooler plugs? Lorn > From: George Braly > Date: February 14, 2012 7:51:26 AM EST >=20 > Colyn, let me respond. >=20 > a) So far, only the Champion fine wire plugs are showing a = significant problem with cracking of porcelain on the central electrode. >=20 > However, since the scrutiny started - - an unrelated collateral issue = has arisen from observation of the frequently encountered high = resistance of the internal RFI resistor. THAT issue is identical for = both massive plugs and fine wire plugs. That problem is not nearly as = significant as the cracking insulator problem. >=20 > b) TAT has no evidence that the Tempest plugs have any issues of any = kind. Fine wire or massive. >=20 > c) We do prefer the 29 heat range plugs. If they were available we = would recommend 27 heat range plugs. The reality is that the only = people that need high heat range plugs are people who operate with rich = mixtures - - to keep down plug deposits. With routine lean mixture = operation there is so far no discernable plug deposits on colder heat = range plugs. I have personally operated a set of experimental -27 = heat range plugs for several hundred hours. The plugs remained clean. = In general, everyone should attempt to identify and operate with the = coldest heat range plugs that do not create deposits or accumulate oil.=20= >=20 > d) I think this is covered above - - -=20 >=20 > Regards, George -- Lorn H. 'Feathers' Olsen, MAA, ASMEL, ASES, Comm, Inst DynaComm, Corp., 248-345-0500, mailto:lorn@dynacomm.us LNC2, FB90/92, O-320-D1F, 1,800 hrs, N31161, Y47, SE Michigan