X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:12:32 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from p01c11o143.mxlogic.net ([208.65.144.66] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.4) with ESMTPS id 5396648 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:05:01 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=208.65.144.66; envelope-from=dave@edt.com Received: from unknown [74.203.58.18] (EHLO swift.edt.com) by p01c11o143.mxlogic.net(mxl_mta-6.13.0-1) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id 822aa3f4.0.162064.00-234.362570.p01c11o143.mxlogic.net (envelope-from ); Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:05:01 -0700 (MST) X-MXL-Hash: 4f3aa24d30c5c550-3ccdde621101441088f4e0237303eecd2afd3b68 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (mill [10.20.10.217]) by swift.edt.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q1EI4Mle012698 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:04:23 -0800 (PST) X-Original-Message-ID: <4F3AA2B9.7050506@edt.com> X-Original-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:06:49 -0800 From: David Lowry User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: Re: [LML] Canopy References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2010122901)] X-MAIL-FROM: X-SOURCE-IP: [74.203.58.18] X-AnalysisOut: [v=1.0 c=1 a=FFsdPcU1_MIA:10 a=-Fa_Hu38_IAA:10 a=BLceEmwcHo] X-AnalysisOut: [wA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=indxA6G3b7uVxdBcnkYBCA==:17 a=Ia] X-AnalysisOut: [-xEzejAAAA:8 a=0S-hDGPKhb0cRVl0s3kA:9 a=J0GfHf_V8UnpUowDxS] X-AnalysisOut: [MA:7 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=CVU0O5Kb7MsA:10] Angier, Do you have any of the trimmings from the canopy to experiment on? Maybe some identical material or someone else has some. I might be able to find some from my Legacy. I think I would try that first no matter what anyone told me. David Lowry On 2/14/2012 8:43 AM, Greenbacks, UnLtd. wrote: > Hi Bill, > > Given possible damage to the canopy from trying to remove old adhesive residue, I'm not inclined to experiment here. > This is one time I don't want to reinvent the wheel. > So I'm looking for a solvent of some sort that won't attack the plexiglass. > > Angier Ames > N4ZQ > > > -- > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html >