X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 06:22:31 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-db02.mx.aol.com ([205.188.91.96] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.3) with ESMTP id 5328243 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 13:51:02 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.91.96; envelope-from=Sky2high@aol.com Received: from mtaomg-da05.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-da05.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.141]) by imr-db02.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id pBRIoKUZ024474 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 13:50:20 -0500 Received: from core-mta004a.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-mta004.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.234.141]) by mtaomg-da05.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id C553DE000087 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 13:50:20 -0500 (EST) From: Sky2high@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <7fe2.71cbcb18.3c2b6d6c@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 13:50:20 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Performance specs X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_7fe2.71cbcb18.3c2b6d6c_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 9.6 sub 168 X-Originating-IP: [24.1.9.48] x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:447241024:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d338d4efa136c4d28 --part1_7fe2.71cbcb18.3c2b6d6c_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Verrrry Interrrrresting! In my IO320 I just plugged in the following: I used elev=700 (my airport), TOW=1600, GW=1800, Temp=32, SL TO=78 (I also lift off at about 80 KIAS), HP=170, PROP EFF=.8 and at 80 KIAS I get 1381 ft for the TO distance and I think that is pretty close. It also claims it would take me 19 seconds to get there and I think that is much less in reality but I will time it on the next TO. I do a slow application of power on the TO roll to avoid veering left. Grayhawk In a message dated 12/27/2011 8:36:40 A.M. Central Standard Time, colyncase@earthlink.net writes: Gary, interesting chart. How would it have to be modified for a IVP? Colyn --part1_7fe2.71cbcb18.3c2b6d6c_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Verrrry Interrrrresting!

In my IO320 I just plugged in the following:

I used elev=3D700 (my airport), TOW=3D1600, GW=3D1800, Temp=3D32, SL T= O=3D78 (I also=20 lift off at about 80 KIAS), HP=3D170, PROP EFF=3D.8 and at 80 KIAS I get 13= 81=20 ft for the TO distance and I think that is pretty close. It= also=20 claims it would take me 19 seconds to get there and I think that is mu= ch=20 less in reality but I will time it on the next TO. I do a slow applic= ation=20 of power on the TO roll to avoid veering left.

Grayhawk

In a message dated 12/27/2011 8:36:40 A.M. Central Standard Time,=20 colyncase@earthlink.net writes:

= Gary,=20

interesting chart.

How would it have to be modified for a IVP?

Colyn

--part1_7fe2.71cbcb18.3c2b6d6c_boundary--